• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Rob Spoor
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Henry Wong
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Saloon Keepers:
  • Jesse Silverman
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Mikalai Zaikin
  • Piet Souris

Sorting Complication

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 194
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All,
I wanted to implement a simple sorting for the JTable (I have cursed sun at least 1,000,000 times for not providing that)

I implemented a simple single level sorting taking help from the TableSorter from the Examples. But there is a small complication.

when there are many rows with same values i just leave the order as it is. But now if i sort it based on column 1 first and then go to column 2 then the order is different and if i go to column 3 first and then to column 2 then t order is different

Please let me know if that is an issue?
 
author and iconoclast
Posts: 24203
44
Mac OS X Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The abililty to sort a collection while leaving equal items in the same order in which they originally appeared is called stability. A stable sort is one that wouldn't have the problem that you describe. The java.util.Arrays.sort(Object[]) method is a stable quicksort -- you could use that.
 
Sam Codean
Ranch Hand
Posts: 194
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Ernst,
I too have done something similar to what you are telling. But the problem that i am facing i will explain
Suppose there are three rows (simplified though)



So you see that after the step 2 of both the variations even though i am sorting the column 2 and it indeed is sorted but yet the rows with the same City will not be having the same order as it depends on which column was selected earlier.

I was wanting to know if that is fine as long as sorting is done correctly on the column 2
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic