This week's book giveaway is in the Kotlin forum.
We're giving away four copies of Kotlin Cookbook and have Ken Kousen on-line!
See this thread for details.
Win a copy of Kotlin Cookbook this week in the Kotlin forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Knute Snortum
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven
  • Joe Ess
  • salvin francis

A.I. is Oxymoron

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If A.I. became what scientists believe and dream of, and if a machine ever became self-aware, wouldn't it be an Intellegent Intety and cease to be Artificial? So while scientists strive towards A.I., are they not limiting themselves?
Just a thought.
Gregg
------------------
Happy Coding,
Gregg Bolinger
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 87
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
By "artificial" may be what they mean is that it does not occur in nature, but is man-made, (not God's creation if i may say so ).
For a simile - 'cotton' is a fabric made out of cotton available in nature but 'polyester' is a man-made (artificial?) fibre.
So even if a machine became self-aware, its intelligence would have to introduced into it "artificially", it is not born with intelligence like humans.
am i on the right track or way off....
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 210
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
How am I suppose to know so much?
 
Gregg Bolinger
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
There is no right track or wrong track. This is all just opinions. But as far as defining Artificial, I agree. And since you brought it up, isn't EVERYTHING "made by God". By your definition that a machine is man made, so are our children. Two people get together to create a child. I think a better definition may be something "organic" vs "inorganic"??
------------------
Happy Coding,
Gregg Bolinger
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 142
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It's just a definition.
If we (humans) later realize that we were systematically manufactured by an advanced specie of aliens, then we would be "artificial" too, despite being composed of organic material.
 
Gregg Bolinger
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
That's not necessarily true. Certain breeds of dogs are "systmatically manufactured" as are many horse and cattle breeds to produce a more advanced breed. And they are not considered Artificial. It can't be "just a definition". I believe that the term itself is the essance of what scientists strive for. Is Life just a definition? Is Intellegents just a definition? The definition may be wrong, and maybe that is the first step. Maybe A.I. needs to be redefined to catch up to the times?

------------------
Happy Coding,
Gregg Bolinger
 
Gregg Bolinger
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Maybe too, we are looking at the definition the wrong way. Instead of saying that the holder of the intellegents is artificial, it's the intellegents that is artificial. And when we look at it that way, then we need to define Intellegents that is not artificial. What makes humans an Intellegent Species? Answer those questions, and then ask yourself, if a machine could harness the same qualaties, regardless of the way it obtained them, would it not cease to be Artificial?

------------------
Happy Coding,
Gregg Bolinger
 
shilpa kulkarni
Ranch Hand
Posts: 87
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
i think, gregg, u r right - the holder is not artificial, but the intelligence is.
i also agree that oragnic is a better definition, but i don't think children are man-made, they are still a wonder of nature....
they would be man-made if they could be manufactured without the use of any human inputs; like a machine is made, without the use of any human inputs.
 
Johnson Chong
Ranch Hand
Posts: 210
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Excuse me, er..., can someone just clear up the air here, I mean could someone summarise for me the thoughts of arguments here....
 
Power corrupts. Absolute power xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is kinda neat.
Java file APIs (DOC, XLS, PDF, and many more)
https://products.aspose.com/total/java
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!