Good morning, everyone, and happy new year!
I'm a C#/.NET developer who is moving to
Java. Because of my background, I'm used to having essentially one and only one provider and framework (i.e. Microsoft's). Now that I've started to look at Java (I already know most of the basics - I'm reading up on
JDBC right now and then it's on to tackle Java EE), I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed at how many frameworks and the like there are; as I said I'm not used to the choice
I'm wondering if I should pick a single "platform", as it were, and then choose to use the framework/etc related to that platform, to keep things simpler than choosing Server A, Framework B, and Utility C.
Let me explain.. I'm a bit confused as to the real difference between the different application servers. I've seen/heard of
Tomcat, Sun Application Server, Glassfish, and
JBoss. With frameworks I'm aware of
Struts being the most common but complex, Spring and Tapestry, and Seam. Would I better off, say, choosing JBoss as the server and then, because I'm using JBoss, using Seam for the framework automatically (because it's linked with JBoss)?
I'm used to there being one and only one (relatively speaking, I know there are now some frameworks for .NET out there) way to do things, so while I'm appreciative of the choice that Javaland offers, it's a bit frightening as I like to use the "industry standard" way of doing things to keep it simple and leverage the community (especially when I am new to something, like the Java platform).
Sorry for the long-winded question, I guess it's not really a "beginner" level question, but I am a beginner to Java (I've done ASP.NET mainly for about 2 years and used C#, so I don't have much to learn for Java - mainly just the quirks and differences)