Unnar Björnsson

Ranch Hand

Posts: 164

posted 12 years ago

Hello

Im trying to create a timed event in java.swing which when fired moves a dot, or ball from point A to point B.

I�ve tried the mathematical way i.e every 20 milliseconds or so the point changes position like this:

currentX += abX / (Math.abs(abX)); // Where abX is the distance from X of

currentY += abY / (Math.abs(abX)); // point A to x of point B and abY is the

// distance from Y of point A to Y of point B

A simple geometry...but the screen is made up of pixels and there is no such thing as 1/2 pixel or 1/3 pixel as the calculation of abY / (Math.abs(abX)) often result there for the dot always miss its target i.e point B on longer ranges.

I need an invisible line to be drawn between A and B and the dot to follow it.

Please help.

Im trying to create a timed event in java.swing which when fired moves a dot, or ball from point A to point B.

I�ve tried the mathematical way i.e every 20 milliseconds or so the point changes position like this:

currentX += abX / (Math.abs(abX)); // Where abX is the distance from X of

currentY += abY / (Math.abs(abX)); // point A to x of point B and abY is the

// distance from Y of point A to Y of point B

A simple geometry...but the screen is made up of pixels and there is no such thing as 1/2 pixel or 1/3 pixel as the calculation of abY / (Math.abs(abX)) often result there for the dot always miss its target i.e point B on longer ranges.

I need an invisible line to be drawn between A and B and the dot to follow it.

Please help.

Stan James

(instanceof Sidekick)

Ranch Hand

Ranch Hand

Posts: 8791

posted 12 years ago

When you compute the new position from the prior position over and over you add up errors. So if it goes a pixel north once and a pixel north again you're off by two. Maybe you could compute the new position from the original position and the number of steps you have taken.

currentX = originalX + ( stepSizeX * stepCount )

That will get you very close to the end with only one error in the last calculation instead of a sum of many errors.

And if you have to hit the targe precisely, you might work backwards.

currentX = targetX - ( stepSizeX * stepsRemaining )

Or you might try keeping current position at high precision and rounding to the nearest pixel when you draw. I guess you could use floating point or do all your math with values multiplied by a million and divide by a million as you draw.

Any way you do it you might see some jiggle around your invisible line as you go.

Any of those sound like they might work?

currentX = originalX + ( stepSizeX * stepCount )

That will get you very close to the end with only one error in the last calculation instead of a sum of many errors.

And if you have to hit the targe precisely, you might work backwards.

currentX = targetX - ( stepSizeX * stepsRemaining )

Or you might try keeping current position at high precision and rounding to the nearest pixel when you draw. I guess you could use floating point or do all your math with values multiplied by a million and divide by a million as you draw.

Any way you do it you might see some jiggle around your invisible line as you go.

Any of those sound like they might work?

A good question is never answered. It is not a bolt to be tightened into place but a seed to be planted and to bear more seed toward the hope of greening the landscape of the idea. John Ciardi

Unnar Björnsson

Ranch Hand

Posts: 164

posted 12 years ago

Yes it did help alot i.e by incrementing a variable by abY/Math.abs(abX) every time and adding it to the original Y.

Thanks alot

Thanks alot

Stan James

(instanceof Sidekick)

Ranch Hand

Ranch Hand

Posts: 8791

posted 3 years ago

I would try to work as if the coordinates were dimensions of vectors.

So you want to find the direction in which you want the ball to travel, by calculating the distances between point A (current position) and point B (goal):

Then you want to normalize that as if it were a vector, by finding the supposed vector's length and setting a velocity for x and y accordingly.

Lastly we apply the velocity to the current position

I hope this helps

So you want to find the direction in which you want the ball to travel, by calculating the distances between point A (current position) and point B (goal):

Then you want to normalize that as if it were a vector, by finding the supposed vector's length and setting a velocity for x and y accordingly.

Lastly we apply the velocity to the current position

I hope this helps

Campbell Ritchie

Sheriff

Posts: 53747

127

posted 3 years ago

Thank you for the solution.

Consider the Math#hypot method instead of using Pythagoras. It uses the same formula as Pythagoras, but only requires you enter the two distances. It can be used along with atan2 to convert rectangular to polar coordinates.

Did you realise this is an old discussion which has come to the surface because somebody posted a rubbish post on it?

Consider the Math#hypot method instead of using Pythagoras. It uses the same formula as Pythagoras, but only requires you enter the two distances. It can be used along with atan2 to convert rectangular to polar coordinates.

Did you realise this is an old discussion which has come to the surface because somebody posted a rubbish post on it?

posted 3 years ago

Oh. I didn't see that. I'm sorry, I should have been more observant

Campbell Ritchie wrote:-snip- Did you realise this is an old discussion which has come to the surface because somebody posted a rubbish post on it?

Oh. I didn't see that. I'm sorry, I should have been more observant

Did you see how Paul cut 87% off of his electric heat bill with 82 watts of micro heaters? |