In a previous project I compared Apache FOP and iText. FOP is better for larger projects, less memory intrinsic, large pdfs, suitable for web applications. In this same application when we used iText the application became very slow.
I will recommend performance
testing on whatever tool you choose for web access. It will be better if you can design the application such that the "pdf generating tool" can be switched if needed.
The copy aspect of the pdf can be disabled using both the tools. Itext is simple to use. Apache FOP is more popular. It is more generic and could be an industry standard in future.
[ December 07, 2005: Message edited by: jiju ka ]
[ December 07, 2005: Message edited by: jiju ka ]