Win a copy of The Journey To Enterprise Agility this week in the Agile and Other Processes forum! And see the welcome thread for 20% off.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Bear Bibeault
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Knute Snortum
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Moores
  • Pete Letkeman
  • Stephan van Hulst
Bartenders:
  • Carey Brown
  • Tim Holloway
  • Joe Ess

overloading  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 57
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Can we call overloading as static polymorphism.But i guess it should be termed as dynamic polymorphism.I have a seminar on polymorphism topic tomorrow.So i guess you guys will clear my doubt by that time.
 
author and iconoclast
Sheriff
Posts: 24220
40
Chrome Eclipse IDE Mac OS X
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I strongly dislike the term "static polymorphism", but people have used it to refer to method overloading. The compiler chooses which method to call "statically", i.e., at compile time. In that case, "Dynamic polymorphism" then refers to runtime method lookup -- i.e., to the way that overridden methods behave, or what we normally call just "polymorphism."
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1780
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
"Static polymorphism" sounds like an oxymoron to me, but it has currency in the C++ community. :roll: Think about how they combine operator overloading and templates.
 
It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!