• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Rob Spoor
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Henry Wong
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Saloon Keepers:
  • Jesse Silverman
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Mikalai Zaikin
  • Piet Souris

Variables created in Static method

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 34
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All,
I have a doubt regarding memory allocations in java,
What I understand from memory allocations to a program is ,
All the instance variables and objects created using the new operator are stored on the heap
And all the static variables created are stored in a special area called as static area.
So Once a class loads, all the static variables are initialized and the static methods been loaded.
Now what i wanted to make clear is ,
what happens when I create some objects in a static method,Can these objects be garbage collected once the execution of this method is over ??because what I could see is objects created in static method ,were still seen on heap...a Example of this was ,
whenever we call function trim() in string ,it internally calls the substring method ,which returns

new String(offset + beginIndex, endIndex - beginIndex, value)

so now for example if i'm doing something like,

So whenever now this MyClass is loaded ,myMethod would get executed as its a static one,so after execution of this method ,would the Strings temp and a be eligible for garbage collection or not?and do we refer to them as static variables because they are created in a static method?

Thanks All,Appreciate your valuable time.
[ September 18, 2006: Message edited by: Archies Gomes ]
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 226
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
All objects are created on the heap.

Variables created in a method (whether it be static or not) are local variables. The are eligible for garbage collection at the end of the method call and are recreated at the start of the method call.

However if you created a object in the method and passed the reference out, then the object wouldn't be eligible for garbage collection if the caller kept the reference.
 
author
Posts: 14112
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Tim LeMaster:
Variables created in a method (whether it be static or not) are local variables. The are eligible for garbage collection at the end of the method call and are recreated at the start of the method call.



Local variables are never garbage collected. They live on the method stack and therefore simply disappear immediately when the method exits.

Objects referenced by a local variable are therefore immediately eligible for gc if there are no other references left.
 
Tim LeMaster
Ranch Hand
Posts: 226
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yep you are absolute correct, thanks for that clarification.
 
Archies Gomes
Ranch Hand
Posts: 34
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Local variables are never garbage collected. They live on the method stack and therefore simply disappear immediately when the method exits.


So what if a string is created inside a static method,it would be still created on heap itself right?
may be the methods get executed on the stack and all the other references and primitive type remains on stack ,but what i fell is the objects would still get the memory from heap itself right?so would all these memory would get cleared(ofcourse not referenced by outside entities in the mthod) on the Garbage collection call?
Thanks,Appreciate your valuable time.
 
Tim LeMaster
Ranch Hand
Posts: 226
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yep no matter where the reference to the object is declared all objects are created on the heap.
 
You showed up just in time for the waffles! And this tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop
https://coderanch.com/wiki/718759/books/Building-World-Backyard-Paul-Wheaton
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic