Win a copy of Java EE 8 High Performance this week in the Java/Jakarta EE forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Practical Jokes (Just Java)  RSS feed

Posts: 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Does the new edition include any good new practical jokes? I've been hoping one of these editions will include your out-of-print Penguin practical jokes books, which I've never been able to obtain. Also, I'm still running Java 4; is there a lot of material that requires Java 5? And would you say that Java 5 is a big improvement over Java 4? Thanks,

Ranch Hand
Posts: 46
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Peter,

Great to hear from you. I should explain for the benefit of other forum readers that my first
book was "The Official Handbook of Practical Jokes" which came out about 15 years ago.
I was working for Sun Microsystems as a programmer in the compiler group at the time.

As a hobby, I was collecting practical jokes. After I had been collecting them for a few years,
I noticed that I had a large number of really good ones. So to better organize the collection,
I wrote them all down in a list, and kept refining it and adding to it, and before I knew it I
had a complete manuscript. So I thought I might as well take it to an agent.

And then something happens that never, ever happens in the publishing world. The first agent
I showed it to, liked it and took me on as a client. The first publisher he showed it to liked it
and decided to publish it! Thus was launched a sideline of mine in writing! There was a
second practical joke book a couple of years later. Then I branched into technical books
(you should write about what you know) and never looked back.

The practical joke books are long since out of print. I put a couple of chapters of one of them
on the CD for the 5th edition, but we dropped the CD from the sixth ed, so there is no practical
way to get that text back in play alas, alas. Every now and again someone finds one at a garage
sale, or emails me to complain about the fantastic price they are fetching in the used book
market at -- not a lot I can do about that, except grin ruefully and
bear it.

A good sense of humor and a good attitude is very important to me. Programming is a
lot of fun - I think most of us would do it even if we weren't paid for it (in fact, anyone
who contributes to freeware or open source software proves that this is so, and I take my hat
off to my colleagues who help out with Linux, or Java freeware). I try to put this sense of
fun, and interest, and liveliness into my technical books, just as much as my humor books.
It makes them easier for most readers - you finish a chapter, you get a fun Light Relief
at the end of it.

But we're not here to talk about practical jokes! It's just a sideline of mine, and I am basically
retired from that business now, so if you come over my house for pizza and beer sometime you
don't have to be on your guard against exploding cans of nuts, whoppee cushions, confetti
trapdoor zingers and the like. Or do you...?

To answer the JDK1.4 vs Java 5 question - well, Java 5 is the release with the most amount of
change of any previous Java release. There have been two big, significant changes to the
language (generic types and enum types) and numerous smaller but still significant changes.

Language changes always have a MUCH greater impact than library API additions. After all,
you can ignore any new library until you are ready to use it. But you can easily come across
code where you don't even recognize what the statements or expressions mean, now that
the syntax of the language has changed. For example, you can now write in Java 5:

That tells the compiler that you are only going to store type String in this LinkedList object,
and you will get an error message if you try and slip some other type in. The whole generic
thing is aimed at doing more and better checking at compile time, while the program is under

Some people have missed the point of generics, and fussed about how all it does is let you
avoid some casting. That is not the point of it at all. Anyway, the full story is in Just Java 6th
, when you are ready to extend your Java learning to get up-to-date with the current rev.
of the language.

I always regret seeing more complexity come into Java. It took me a long time to get
used to nested classes (which came in in 1997, Yikes!) I griped to John about my
reservations - he is the Sun compiler engineer who designed and implemented it. He gently
explained why I was wrong, and why I would have to get used to it so I did. But, well you
know, you always think simpler would be better. John was a long time Lisp engineer, and
he designed Java nested classes to be very close to a functional language feature called a
"closure" with one eye on Lisp. Java is a more powerful language for it, and it all worked out
OK in the end. If you look at what they did in the Microsoft world, they just introduced a
total hack that said "ok, this method is a handler for that event"! Two different approaches,
two different results.

Generic types are more complex than I would like - the syntax repels me (don't tell anyone
I said that, OK?) - but I have to admit I cannot suggest any other syntax that would be an
improvement. You could change the approach to use keywords instead of symbols. But
that has some issues of its own. Anyway, bottom line: I think the saving grace of generics is
that most programmers will encounter it as a CONSUMER of the feature, not a DESIGNER of
some generic code. It is really only API designers who will define generic classes. The full
story is in chapter 15 of Just Java.

That's a long answer, but as long as people are finding this useful, I will continue.

Weeds: because mother nature refuses to be your personal bitch. But this tiny ad is willing:
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!