So Nanjangud, would you like some more kindling to pile onto this topic, or shall we light it now?
Seriously, I know I can count on you to keep civil (well
almost always
) but the topics you raise seem sure to invite some less polite responses. I'll have a fire hose ready just in case. Anyway...
> The way you think, the way you talk, the way you address
> issues... can the practice of a religion mold these?
I imagine so - the younger you are, the more effect it would have. But other factors are significantly more important I think - like what is the actual observed
behavior of the parents, as opposed to whatever they are
telling their kids is good or bad. What sort of peers and role models does the child have to interact with? In the US at least, I think television and other media have a lot more influence on young minds than religious practices do. And where there is influence from religion, it isn't always what you might expect. It's not unsusal for a strict religious background to lead to lead to rebellion as the child matures. Which may or may not be a temporary phase.
> ...there's a general view that Jews are good at business.
> If that is true, how did they get to be that way?
> Did their religion help?
There's a section in the Bible (John 2:13-16) where Jesus goes into a temple (Jewish of course) and finds moneylenders there. He drives them out and admonishes them to keep their business out of his father's house. This was taken by many Christians as an indication that moneylending is a Bad Thing, which good Christians were not supposed to get involved in. Which meant that as Christianity
rose in influence, there was a growing shortage of good moneylenders. Fortunately most European cities had a small community of people who were free from this onerous restriction, and thus Jews became the dominant force in banking in Europe. This tended to translate into general financial success in the community, which in turn led to increased chance of success in other forms of business as well. All of which led to a fair amount of resentment among the good Christians who chose the (allegedly more noble) route of worldly poverty. Which of course led to all sorts of other things that we don't really want to get into here. (Errr... if it isn't already too late...)
Bottom line- sure, religion can create cultural pressures which can influence likely career paths of members of that religion. Or in some cases, for certain cast... ahem...
classes of people within a religion.
But we probably don't want to get into that either. (Or if we do, I'll leave it to someone who understands the details a lot better than I do.)
Naturally, many of the details in the preceding paragraphs may be grossly oversimplified, or downright wrong. My apologies for any major errors I've committed. Hopefully though this can lead to an interesting ongoing discussion in which people can remember to keep their cool and avoid gratuitous insults to others...
> We are utterly dedicated to a serious non-partisan approach to
> the ecumenical ecclesiastic issues that currently affect the
> world's religions, and we handle this with amazing alacritous
> acumen, and are renowned for our circumlocutory skills in
> handling these issues.
NN, I think you had entirely too much fun in composing that paragraph.
With anyone else I'd question if "circumlocutory" was really the
word you meant to use, but of course I have no such doubts where you're concerned.
In an unrelated note, thanks to Shama for a particularly reasonable and also entertaining post. I disagree a bit with your "bless you" analogy (it's more like "bless me! Did you rembember to bless me? Thanks to those who remembered to bless me!") but in general your points are well taken.