• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown
  • Jesse Duncan
  • Frits Walraven
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Can art exist without the artist?

Ranch Hand
Posts: 100
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by <zirf>:

Can exgibicionizm exist separately from exgibicionist?

In terms of creating the exhibitionism, of course not. But in terms of how it's perceived, I think it can, and in fact should. Exhibitionism itself is unilateral and doesn't involve any need to be "understood". Literature, on the other hand, at least pretends to carry meaning for the perceiver. I suppose "literary exhibitionism", if there is such a thing, must be a combination of the two: the author exhibits himself for purely selfish reasons, and the reader is left trying to understand the meaning of it all.
pie. tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic