• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Rob Spoor
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Tim Cooke
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven
  • Himai Minh

Who Killed The Electric Car

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Found this relevant to the discussion.

http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1039761_2011-chevy-volt-investment-how-does-this-differ-from-the-ev1
 
Bartender
Posts: 9625
16
Mac OS X Linux Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Not quite relevant, but I got a chuckle out of it:
 
Trailboss
Posts: 23366
IntelliJ IDE Firefox Browser Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Joe Ess wrote:Not quite relevant, but I got a chuckle out of it:



That would be funnier if it showed the pollution from gasoline as you use it and the pollution from gasoline as all of the components are pumped/mined, processed, distributed and acquired.

Granted, there are lots of parts of electric cars that have problems, but gasoline has all of the same problems plus more.

People try to say that riding a bicycle is clean, and then the comic comes out showing all of the pollution that was involved to build a bicycle. Or to fuel the food stream so the person has the energy to propel the bicycle. All true and not a valid comparison.

Electric cars are a big step in the right direction.

And there are people with electric cars that get their power purely from at-home solar or micro-hydro. So there is, at least, a growth path for something cleaner. And cheaper!



 
Sheriff
Posts: 3036
12
Mac IntelliJ IDE Python VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Drafting actually can greatly improve your gas mileage, especially if you're behind a truck. However, the effect is negligible at any safe following distance. My reference on this is Mythbusters, who ... usually, kind of, sort of ... get things basically right.

Automatic roads have potential. The idea is that certain highways would take control of your car and drive for you, allowing closer following distances and also smoothing traffic flow by reducing the omg!!!-an-accident-I'll-slam-on-my-brakes-to-get-good-look-at-the-carnage syndrome. However, I remember reading that, in a simulation, over a quarter of drivers crashed immediately on exiting the highway and having to resume control of their cars. We can't win for losing!
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1061
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
An unpleasant update:
Production of Chevy Volt/Opel Ampera paused

As i said: everybody finds the Electric Car great. But only if other people buy it. Because "we" should do something for the environment Hopefully this doesn't hit GM and the employees too hard. Opel, GM's German subsidiary, is nearby where i live.

What's the reason for the weak acceptance of the car in your eyes?
 
Gregg Bolinger
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Here's a shot in the dark that people might not be considering.

1. I live in a city where mass transit is readily available so I take the train/cab/subway. I have no real need for a commute vehicle so why would I buy one?

2. I drive and my commute is more than an electric car can really travel, so why would I buy one?

3. I could get an electric car for my daily commute, but why would I buy yet another vehicle for that? I still need to be able to travel greater distances on occasion.

I fit in with mostly #3. I work from home so really don't even have a commute. But on occasion I have to travel 200+ miles to visit family or vacation or whatever. So why would I buy an electric short range vehicle?
 
Chris Baron
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1061
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The range of more than 300 miles in hybrid mode is actually quite good but there are no power sockets in the streets where i have to park beeing a towner.

The price is 10000 - 15000 € higher than a comparable gasoline powered car because of the battery. But that can't be the only reason for the reluctance to buy it. I mean there are plenty of people who use their Porsche Cayennes and other expensive cars for commuting and shopping.



 
Joe Ess
Bartender
Posts: 9625
16
Mac OS X Linux Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Chris Baron wrote:The price is 10000 - 15000 € higher than a comparable gasoline powered car because of the battery. But that can't be the only reason for the reluctance to buy it. I mean there are plenty of people who use their Porsche Cayennes and other expensive cars for commuting and shopping.



Those expensive cars give the user value for the money in performance, style and luxury. The Volt has none of those things. I am not surprised it did not sell.

"The price premium on the Volt just doesn't make economic sense for the average consumer when there are so many fuel-efficient gasoline-powered cars available, typically for thousands of dollars less."


From the article Chris posted.
 
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Joe Ess wrote:Those expensive cars give the user value for the money in performance, style and luxury. The Volt has none of those things. I am not surprised it did not sell.



Have you driven one? While its labeled a Chevy instead of Buick or Cadillac, it is a very nice car. I'll grant no style. It has decent performance and great gas mileage, and is quiet, rides well and has tons of luxury features.

It is expensive, and I'm sure that didn't help sales.

edited to fix quotation block
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1408
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Joe Ess wrote:

Chris Baron wrote:The price is 10000 - 15000 € higher than a comparable gasoline powered car because of the battery. But that can't be the only reason for the reluctance to buy it. I mean there are plenty of people who use their Porsche Cayennes and other expensive cars for commuting and shopping.



Those expensive cars give the user value for the money in performance, style and luxury. The Volt has none of those things. I am not surprised it did not sell.

From the article Chris posted.

Not to mention sexual access to cute but shallow women. But if we could make the electric car a marker for wealth and status, there's no reason electric car owners couldn't get the same benefit.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Frank Silbermann wrote:Not to mention sexual access to cute but shallow women. But if we could make the electric car a marker for wealth and status, there's no reason electric car owners couldn't get the same benefit.



The Fisker aimed to provide that. But it looks like Fisker, the man was more con-man than businessman. and Fisker the company is not long for this world unless it gets another billion dollar Federal bailout.
 
Marshal
Posts: 26750
81
Eclipse IDE Firefox Browser MySQL Database
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Gregg Bolinger wrote:I work from home so really don't even have a commute. But on occasion I have to travel 200+ miles to visit family or vacation or whatever. So why would I buy an electric short range vehicle?



Indeed. In fact why would you buy a vehicle at all? Why not just rent one when you need one?
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

paul wheaton wrote:That would be funnier if it showed the pollution from gasoline as you use it and the pollution from gasoline as all of the components are pumped/mined, processed, distributed and acquired.



Only if you show the damage that coal powered plants cause. From mountain-top removal to toxic water seeping out of the mines, to the tons of evil gases and poisons that coal fired power plant belch, its hard to make a serious claim that electric cars are as pure as the fanboys say.

Perhaps if the electricity was generated by wind or wave power, it would suck less.
 
Frank Silbermann
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1408
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Pat Farrell wrote:

paul wheaton wrote:That would be funnier if it showed the pollution from gasoline as you use it and the pollution from gasoline as all of the components are pumped/mined, processed, distributed and acquired.



Only if you show the damage that coal powered plants cause. From mountain-top removal to toxic water seeping out of the mines, to the tons of evil gases and poisons that coal fired power plant belch, its hard to make a serious claim that electric cars are as pure as the fanboys say.

Perhaps if the electricity was generated by wind or wave power, it would suck less.

I don't think I've ever seen a comprehensive comparison of the ecological costs involved, between mining and burning coal, versus drilling, transporting, refining, re-transporting and finally burning gasoline. It's not clear to me which would be worse.

I _suspect_ that coal would be worse; on the other hand, most renewable sources are electricity based, and a move towards electric cars might complement the development of those sources.
For example, wind and solar electric power are unreliable; but if the price of electricity varied during the day depending upon the wind, people who had flexibility as to when to charge their cars could have computers monitor the weather to favor moments when there is a lot of wind.
 
Marshal
Posts: 73747
332
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What they “forget” is that a large proportion of the pollution caused by cars consists of
  • 1: Ground covered with tarmac for roads
  • 2: Ground covered with tarmac for parking
  • 3: Traffic and traffic noise in towns
  • 4: Traffic and traffic noise in the open country
  • There are also other harmful side-effects of motorised mobility, eg isolation of travellers from one another, handicapping those who cannot drive for any reason, accidents. Obviously this applied when the fastest form of transport was a horse and carriage, but maybe to a lesser extent.
     
    Pat Farrell
    Rancher
    Posts: 4686
    7
    Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
    • Mark post as helpful
    • send pies
      Number of slices to send:
      Optional 'thank-you' note:
    • Quote
    • Report post to moderator

    Frank Silbermann wrote:For example, wind and solar electric power are unreliable


    Variable is a better word. While solar is a silly idea in parts of the country, such as Washington state and Oregon, and all of the North East, it makes plenty of sense in the South West where there are 300 sunny days a year. The problem is matching the generating times with the usage times. This means lots of storage for the power generated when there is low demand.

    The electrical grid and appliances beg to be smart and networked. Let the price of power rise and fall with the cost of generating it. Let the appliances know the power price: your dishwasher could wait, loaded and ready to go until the price of power to drive it drops. The idea has been around a decade or more.
     
    Frank Silbermann
    Ranch Hand
    Posts: 1408
    • Mark post as helpful
    • send pies
      Number of slices to send:
      Optional 'thank-you' note:
    • Quote
    • Report post to moderator

    Campbell Ritchie wrote:What they “forget” is that a large proportion of the pollution caused by cars consists of

  • 1: Ground covered with tarmac for roads
  • 2: Ground covered with tarmac for parking
  • 3: Traffic and traffic noise in towns
  • 4: Traffic and traffic noise in the open country
  • There are also other harmful side-effects of motorised mobility, eg isolation of travellers from one another, handicapping those who cannot drive for any reason, accidents. Obviously this applied when the fastest form of transport was a horse and carriage, but maybe to a lesser extent.

    I suspect that elimination of all the automobile-generated pollution save for paving the roads and parking lots, it would be a significant improvement. Going to electric cars would greatly reduce the noise. Accidents will be reduced with smart cars that drive themselves (as will be the handicaps of those who cannot drive for any reason. Degradation of moral standards is already reducing teenagers' reliance on automobiles as a place for sex (extrapolating trends of the past 50 years, soon parents will allow junior high school students to invite opposite-sex friends -- or same-sex friends of gay children -- for sleep-overs).
     
    reply
      Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
    • New Topic