• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • paul wheaton
  • Paul Clapham
  • Ron McLeod
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Roland Mueller
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

static block and exception handling

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 45
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

Can I throw exception from a static block???

class MyClass throws Exception{
static{
try{
// do some thing like loading some library
System.load("MyLibrary");

} catch (Exception e){
throw new Exception("Failed to load MyLibrary");
}
}//end static

MyClass(){ // constructor }

} // end MyClass

But then I would have to add 'throws Exception' clause after class declaration as shown above - which I don't think is right ( and it also gives me error.)

I am loading native library in static block - which, if fails, shuts JVM all together. I would like to have some graceful way of handling this situation.

How can I do this?

Thanks,
P.Ingle
[ July 08, 2005: Message edited by: P. Ingle ]
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 323
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by P. Ingle:
I am loading native library in static block - which, if fails, shuts JVM all together. I would like to have some graceful way of handling this situation.



if the failure really should exit the entire program, then you don't need to throw an exception in order to achieve this — you can just print an error message and System.exit() to get out. in fact, that would likely be more graceful than leaving the user with a stack dump from an unhandled exception on the screen.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 61
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
How would you be able to handle an exception that shuts down the JVM anyways?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3061
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
IIRC, you can put the throws clause after the static keyword:

Also note that it is usually considered a good practice to throw (or catch) specific Exception subclasses rather than just throwing (or catching) Exception itself. This is primarily because when you catch Exception, this also includes Runtime errors that usually indicate a programming error such as NullPointerException.

HTH

Layne
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
No, you can't put a throws clause after the static keyword.

What you need to do is throw an ExceptionInInitializerError. From the JavaDocs:

Signals that an unexpected exception has occurred in a static initializer. An ExceptionInInitializerError is thrown to indicate that an exception occurred during evaluation of a static initializer or the initializer for a static variable.



Which is exactly what you're looking for.

- Peter
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 317
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello Peter,

Welcome to Javaranch.
You might also want to take a look at This.

Its a 3.5 year old thread
 
Peter Korsten
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
And it's a thread that contains a couple of incorrect answers, and yet shows up as one of the first hits on Google, which likely would lead other developers down the wrong path.

Apart from that, throwing an exception from a static block that will not exit your application is probably a bad idea.

- Peter
 
Rancher
Posts: 5184
84
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Peter Korsten wrote:What you need to do is throw an ExceptionInInitializerError.


Well, we don't quite need to, in the sense that any other exception we throw will be caught by the JVM, wrapped in an ExceptionInInitializerError, and then rethrown. So if we want to throw some other (unchecked) exception with more specific information about what went wrong, that works too. There are pros and cons to each approach, but they both end up with the result that the class is subsequently unusable, and letting the JVM exit is often the best strategy.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic