• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Ron McLeod
  • paul wheaton
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Roland Mueller
  • Himai Minh
Bartenders:

DiceGame Code - which is better?

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 143
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
They are quite alike, but i believe one is better writte.
Which should i use, and can i improve on it?

code 1



code 2:

[/size]
 
Stephen Foy
Ranch Hand
Posts: 143
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Anything please??
 
Sheriff
Posts: 17734
302
Mac Android IntelliJ IDE Eclipse IDE Spring Debian Java Ubuntu Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Stephen,

Honestly, your code still needs a bit of work to make it clearer and easier to follow. As I mentioned in another thread, you should write code in such a way that it reads the way it is intended to work. Each method should have a single responsibility and consistent level of abstraction and detail. Assign methods names that reflect what they actually do. Your rollDice() method does not actually just roll the dice; it does almost everything.

My first-cut implementation of rollDice() would probably be something like:



But then again, this code is very procedural. If I really wanted OO code, I might try something like:



Notice that these first methods do not have much detail but they give you a high-level view of what happens in the program. If you need more detail, you would drill down to other methods. Those methods would have a lower level of abstraction and more detail. The trick is getting the right balance of detail and abstraction.
 
Stephen Foy
Ranch Hand
Posts: 143
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks im gonna give it another bash, i think my problem is we havnt started OO programming yet, the ways i ave used are the ways we have been shown so far. Only been in java for 2-3 months. My problem is, linking methods, like you have there methods called in other methods.

How?

Thanks for the advice.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic