MH
MH
42
Originally posted by Jeroen Wenting:
That said, in my personal experience the code coming out of India is usually substandard and project failure rates are far higher than those of locally run projects (100% failure for technical reasons against maybe 50% at most, and those 50% mainly for political rather than technical reasons).
42
"....bigmouth strikes again, and I've got no right to take my place with the human race...."<p>SCJP 1.4
Originally posted by Jeroen Wenting
Examples of projects failed because they were offshored
--------------------------------------------------------
1 was cancelled when several months after the deadline not a single line of code had been delivered.
1 was delivered but was of such appalling quality that we had to rewrite it from scratch.
The last was cancelled when the code that was delivered didn't meet the project specifications even closely
Before you take these remarks as inflammatory, let me make clear that it is a pointless discussion where you equate the quality of code with nationality of people, except if you want to find out the count of chauvinists in and around here.
Also Indian programmers work on not-so-modern hardware platforms and coding styles. The type of customer needs and quality and reliability standards are also on the lower end.
A good workman is known by his tools.
Originally posted by Jeroen Wenting:
I've been involved in 3 outsourced projects on the sidelines.
1 was cancelled when several months after the deadline not a single line of code had been delivered.
1 was delivered but was of such appalling quality that we had to rewrite it from scratch.
The last was cancelled when the code that was delivered didn't meet the project specifications even closely (plus being incomplete even what was delivered) and the Indian company in question demanded more money or else they'd sue us for breach of contract.
Of course projects everywhere fail for technical reasons, or run over schedule. But the ratio I've encountered of that is far lower than what I've seen in outsourced projects as well as what I've heard from people I trust who had similar experiences.
Kishore
SCJP, blog
Originally posted by Kishore Dandu:
Don't worry about the above poster. He is always against outsourcing, indian programmers etc(without substantial reasoning).
Originally posted by Mohan Panigrahi:
2. All code conforming to CMM5.
Originally posted by Jeffrey Hunter:
So, to the originator of this lovely thread, what exactly is your point?
I am a Papad
[ flickr ]
Originally posted by Homer Phillips:
More snipes by the Indians....
Commentary From the Sidelines of history
Originally posted by Jeffrey Hunter:
Certainly the article speaks for itself, but as we are all here to engage in enlightening discussion, your own words would be much more valued.
Commentary From the Sidelines of history
Originally posted by Paul McKenna:
You can bet that if India and Pakistan launch a nuclear war, the TOI will still have a semi-nude model on its front page.
Originally posted by Homer Phillips:
More snipes by the Indians.
.. They do not support social security. They do not provide their elders with medicare. They do not pay the cost of maintaining air quality in California.
MH
Originally posted by Homer Phillips:
More snipes by the Indians.
The point they are trying to make is that Indians are just fundamentally smarter and better. Why they cannot answer, "Why the Japanese turn out better code?" Why they will not answer if they are so great, why the software industry did not originate in India?
When they are competing with labor forces in the US and the EU where the employees are heavily taxed; they have a great competetive advantage. They do not support social security. They do not provide their elders with medicare. They do not pay the cost of maintaining air quality in California. The produce their software in little walled enclaves surrounded by seas of poverty.
In time, they will be taxed more heavily.
In order to win business, they have to be cheaper. They have to be as good or better. Once they run the domestic competition out of business in the US and the EU, they will have to compete with themselves and their cheaper competitors. Now they will be the established providers. At this point they will decide the CMM5 designation is a costly burden they can no longer competetively provide.
The quality of their products will fall.
Enjoy your little arrogant snipes. We know what your desperation to abandon India for life in the US or the EU indicates.
Kishore
SCJP, blog
The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. - William Gibson
Sonny Gill LinkedIn
Tweets
I am a Papad
Originally posted by Homer Phillips:
In the US, people want to make a quick buck. The culture is based on this quarter's massaged numbers.
I am a Papad
Originally posted by Homer Phillips:
Sameer Jamal, you posted the above here.
- Varun
Message for you sir! I think it is a tiny ad:
The Low Tech Laboratory Movie Kickstarter is LIVE NOW!
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/paulwheaton/low-tech
|