Kishore
SCJP, blog
With respect to coverage, I would say about 20% of world population does care about cricket and do follow it on a professional level.
Originally posted by Deepak Mahbubani:
Its not the question of how many countries participate. The point is, its a very slow and boring game. It would take atleast 2 months just to figure out the winner if cricket were in Olympics.
Moreover, this game has not attracted much interst world-wide because of match-fixing and other allegations.
Kishore
SCJP, blog
Originally posted by Basudev Agrawal:
Out of which about 17% belong to India only. I would say lets calculate the coverage in terms of the number of Countries that actively participate in International Cricket.
Kishore
SCJP, blog
Le Cafe Mouse - Helen's musings on the web - Java Skills and Thrills
"God who creates and is nature is very difficult to understand, but he is not arbitrary or malicious." OR "God does not play dice." - Einstein
Le Cafe Mouse - Helen's musings on the web - Java Skills and Thrills
"God who creates and is nature is very difficult to understand, but he is not arbitrary or malicious." OR "God does not play dice." - Einstein
- Varun
Originally posted by Joe King:
Seeing as its mostly Commonwealth countries that play cricket (due to Britain's habit of inventing games for other countries to thrash us at), perhaps cricket should be part of the Commonwealth games, if it isn't in the Olympics.
Le Cafe Mouse - Helen's musings on the web - Java Skills and Thrills
"God who creates and is nature is very difficult to understand, but he is not arbitrary or malicious." OR "God does not play dice." - Einstein
- Varun
Originally posted by Helen Thomas:
Twenty 20 cricket is faster and becoming ever more popular,
Kishore
SCJP, blog
42
Originally posted by Jeroen Wenting:
out of over 200 countries participating only Indonesia didn't purchase TV rights (maybe some African countries without televisions didn't either, the story didn't tell).
There's not only requirements for inclusion of a sport but also a maximum number of included sports (this to keep the size of the event managable).
That's why there is now a system of a number of core events that come back every event and a number of other "demonstration" sports which rotate.
Cricket might well at some point make it as a demonstration sport, just as Curling did during the last winter olympics.
Kishore
SCJP, blog
I've heard it takes forever to grow a woman from the ground
Originally posted by Joseph George:
Joe's vote:
Chess is not a sport, to answer whomever asked why it's not in the Olympics.
Rugby should be an olympic sport.
Cricket is a silly game to begin with.
Kishore
SCJP, blog
Originally posted by Joseph George:
Chess is not a sport
Originally posted by Adrian Wallace:
2) Only handful of countries play cricket.
3) Of those countries that do play cricket, in many it is still not the most followed sport
Take Australia for example - its probably fair to say a higher percentage of the population follow sports here than in most countries, even here cricket is not followed by any more than 5 - 10% of the population.
In the UK where sport is less fanatically followed and cricket very much a minority interest sport the numbers would be less, perhaps less than 1% of the population being interested (with a sport like Soccer having a following of the vast majority of sports fans closer to 20% of the population).
So where does this enormous guestimate of 20% of worlds population following cricket come from? Are you suggesting the India and Pakistan have almost 100% of their populations following the sport?
Kishore
SCJP, blog
Le Cafe Mouse - Helen's musings on the web - Java Skills and Thrills
"God who creates and is nature is very difficult to understand, but he is not arbitrary or malicious." OR "God does not play dice." - Einstein
42
I've heard it takes forever to grow a woman from the ground
Originally posted by Joseph George:
pistol shooting is not a sport.