Hi,
I do not beieve there is any difference between the two apart you are only allowed to extend one class so if you extend thread you would not be able to extend anything else.
This is why implement runnable is probably the best option.
Quote found:
"If you're considering having your class extend Thread ask yourself, "Have I invented a new kind of thread, or do I simply have something that executes in a thread?". If it's the latter (and it usually is) then
you should strongly consider implementing Runnable instead.
There are a few reasons for this. The first is mainly aestheic. The extends & implements keywords denote an "is a" relationship. Extending Thread declares that your class is a new kind of light-weight process. On the other hand, implementing Runnable declares that your class is a task that can execute in a thread. In other words, it's not the process itself, but rather what the process is doing. The distinction is subtle but it can be important.
There are practical reasons too. For one thing, extending Thread means that you cannot extend anything else. If you MUST extend from another class then you'll have to implement Runnable instead.
Also, several methods in the Thread class are synchronized. If you declare synchronized methods in your Thread subclass then you run the risk that they will interfere with the normal thread functions. You might even encounter a deadlock. It's safest to avoid synchronizing on the same object for two different purposes.
A good rule of thumb is to always implement Runnable and extend Thread only if you have a very good reason. If you think about it, I think you'll find very few reasons not to implement Runnable."
Hope this helps,
John