Win a copy of Five Lines of Code this week in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
Sheriffs:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • fred rosenberger
  • salvin francis
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
  • Carey Brown

RPC vs Document/Literal

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 629
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All,

I googled and understood some concepts regarding the above approach. Can anyone tell me if I am right or wrong?

1). RPC approach

-->Input and Output to the web service(In the soap request/response) is a method name and parameters.
-->Cannot validate the request to the web service

2).Document/Literal approach:

-->Input and Output to the web service are XML messages.
-->Can validate the SOAP Request with an XML Schema.

Thanks.
 
Arjun Reddy
Ranch Hand
Posts: 629
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I just want to make sure before I get into the testing stuff coz am a complete novice to this.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1183
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Arjun,

The cheerful page Soap Fight: RPC vs. Document supports your summary.

Regards,
Dan
 
Arjun Reddy
Ranch Hand
Posts: 629
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Dan for the link. I am just trying to find out if what I understood is correct. is it?/

Thanks.
 
Bartender
Posts: 2968
6
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Arjun Reddy:
I am just trying to find out if what I understood is correct. is it?



You aren't quite there yet. Here are some nits
  • You can't compare RPC and Document/literal. You can compare messaging styles (RPC vs Document), encoding styles (encoding vs literal), or messaging modes (e.g. RPC/literal vs Document/literal)
  • "Cannot validate the request to the web service" - should most likely be Cannot validate message payloads with XML Schema. Document/literal payloads can be validated entirely through XML schema, RPC/literal payloads have to take the WSDL's message composition rules into account (so the validator would have to be WSDL aware), and the encoding of RPC/encoding is outside of the scope of XML Schema and WSDL.
  • You are not considering the the "Wrapped Document/literal" convention which describes an informal RPC-oriented payload document format that is fully validatable through XML. It's just not being that honest about being "RPC".


  • I've always found these useful:
    Which style of WSDL should I use?
    wrapped document/literal convention
     
    Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
      Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
    • New Topic