• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Frank Carver
  • Henry Wong
  • Ron McLeod
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Piet Souris
  • Himai Minh

Single table for Class or Single Table for Classes

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 413
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Guys,

To me (may be bcos im not a native english man), the term "Single table for Class" means that there would be a separate single table for each class. But in real, There is only a single table for all classes.

So I think "Single table for Class" should be read as "Single Table for Classes".

What do you think?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1710
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Chaminda,

There are three known mappings available:

1- Single table per class hierarchy
2- Table per concrete class
3- Table per subclass
 
Chaminda Amarasinghe
Ranch Hand
Posts: 413
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks,

My bad. It is "single table per class hierarchy". Not single table for class.
 
I brought this back from the farm where they grow the tiny ads:
the value of filler advertising in 2021
https://coderanch.com/t/730886/filler-advertising
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic