I would appreciate if instead focusing operability with .Net the exam focused interoperability with generic non-java webservices... REWORK THESE 10.4 AND 10.5 OBJECTIVES!
Originally posted by Victor Williams Stafusa da Silva:
I understand the need for interoperability with non-java webservices, however non-java != .net. There are webservices in lots of languages, including perl, ruby and python. However, the test failed to focus interoperability with non-java webservices focusing instead interoperability specifically with .Net.
Originally posted by Vyas Sanzgiri:
I feel the objectives are in no way reflect the practical difficulties faced.