Rashmi Jaik
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 01, 2009 21:30:00
I couldn't find an errata for SCJP 6, so I don't know if this was previously addressed. On page 298 of the SCJP 6 book Table 4-1 5th row - throws a compile time error , does not print false but the table says the result is false. Foo[] fa = new Foo[3]; //Following throws compiler error, wont print false System.out.println(fa instanceof Foo); System.out.println(fa instanceof Bar); System.out.println(fa instanceof Face);
Sagar Rohankar
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 01, 2009 22:37:00
Originally posted by Rashmi Jaik: On page 298 of the SCJP 6 book Table 4-1 5th row - throws a compile time error , does not print false
Neither you provided the code snippet nor URL and I don't have a book to refer, So provide the code !!
Punit Singh
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 01, 2009 23:35:00
Rashmi you are correct here, this should be an errata. Even foo[1] will only return true when foo[1]=new Foo(); means foo[1] is assigned Foo object. here is code Sagar:
Sagar Rohankar
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 02, 2009 00:10:00
OK, I got it now , This lines throws the errors : foo is an object on Foo[], an array object.
Rashmi Jaik
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 04, 2009 09:25:35
Sagar Rohankar wrote:
Originally posted by Rashmi Jaik:
On page 298 of the SCJP 6 book Table 4-1
5th row - throws a compile time error , does not print false
Neither you provided the code snippet nor URL and I don't have a book to refer, So provide the code !!
This post is only for those who have the book
Sagar Rohankar
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 06, 2009 21:27:25
Rashmi Jaik wrote:
Sagar Rohankar wrote:
Originally posted by Rashmi Jaik:
On page 298 of the SCJP 6 book Table 4-1
5th row - throws a compile time error , does not print false
Neither you provided the code snippet nor URL and I don't have a book to refer, So provide the code !!
This post is only for those who have the book
Oops, Sorry then, sorry for wasting my time and mind..
And thanks Punit for sharing a code for me...
Rashmi Jaik
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 07, 2009 08:47:54
Sagar Rohankar wrote:
Neither you provided the code snippet nor URL and I don't have a book to refer, So provide the code !!
I thought it was obvious that this post was made only for those who have the book.
I should have made it more obvious. No regrets.
James Tharakan
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 07, 2009 08:55:11
EDITED
Sagar Rohankar
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 13, 2009 21:29:23
Rashmi Jaik wrote:
Sagar Rohankar wrote:
Neither you provided the code snippet nor URL and I don't have a book to refer, So provide the code !!
I thought it was obvious that this post was made only for those who have the book.
Ok, fine.
Those who got that book, fine for them. I like to know the question (code), to learn things..(Not for only me, for other fellow Ranchers too). So its better, to provide the code, so that peoples like me ( who don't have a book ) gain some knowledge.
Rashmi Jaik wrote:
Sagar Rohankar wrote:
I should have made it more obvious. No regrets.
Yes, you should ..
Rashmi Jaik
,
Ranch Hand
Jan 14, 2009 10:04:50
I got the book because it explains things clearly in a way I can understand. It is hard to understand things out of context.
Sasparilla and fresh horses for all my men! You will see to it, won't you tiny ad?
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com