Win a copy of Spring in Action (5th edition) this week in the Spring forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Knute Snortum
  • Junilu Lacar
  • paul wheaton
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
  • Ron McLeod
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • salvin francis
  • Tim Holloway

Stateless Sessions Beans  RSS feed

Ranch Hand
Posts: 226
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

I'm still pretty new to EJB, so appologies now if this is a silly question.

I'm reading "Mastering EJB 4th Ed", and reading about Stateless Session Beans...

"Some business processes naturally lend themselves to a single request conversation.
A single request business process is one that does not require state to be
maintained across method invocations

So, I wrote my bean (ignore the fact that it is Stateless, and I have a value inside).

And the following client code:

and because this was two method calls, I expected
"value = "
but got
"value = 20"

It remembered the 20, across method invocations. This isn't supposed to happen?!

Even if I do another ctx.lookup between the setting and getting of the value (so get a new bean), I still find that the 20 is remembered.

Perhaps I need to define a method in my bean using the @remove annotation (so that the Container knows that it can destroy my bean), but then how is this different to Session Beans?


Any help appreciated!

Ranch Hand
Posts: 383
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Stateless beans don't preserve state, but there is nothing stopping you from using instance variables to actually preserve it. What you must be aware of, though, is that the next time the same client calls the stateless bean, a completely different instance might be used, and reading the state would yield different results. It is a coincidence (more or less) that your client got the same bean both times. If you want to test it, you can do what I did:
1. create a stateless session bean, with an integer
2. create a servlet that increments the counter, and then retrieves it and displays on screen
3. test it, by going to the url of your servlet, and hold F5 for a few second, maybe more
What I got was that for the first 80-100 invocations the counter kept incrementing, then suddenly it reset itself to 1, and started incrementing again. That's exactly how a stateless bean behaves - the second sequence of calls was to another instance of the same bean type, with the state _not_ preserved.
So, while for such simple test it might act as if stateless beans preserve state and are no different than statefull, consider a scenario where thousands of clients call the same bean (actually there will probably be many instances in a bean pool) - you would notice data inconsistency sooner thatn you might expect!
Also, stateless beans don't have a @Remove method, they cannot be explicitly removed by the client, only by server crash, exception, or inactivity when the container wants to get rid lingering instances.

PS I used Glassfish v2 for my test, but the behavior would be very similar if not almost identical for others.

Mark Garland
Ranch Hand
Posts: 226
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Raf,

Sorry for taking so long to reply - I really did appreciate your response - I was just keen to try this out for myself and finding time took longer than ideal!

I did manage to prove what you said. I did this by having threads that would set values on the bean instance then retrieve and compare them.
On JBoss, with stateless I got upto about 2 threads running before they started retrieving values they didn't expect, however a single thread worked fine (but more out of coincidence).
With stateful, I got up to 60+ threads before my system started hanging!

See below for the code used. I've put it here in the hope that it may be useful for someone else (although there are 1 or 2 hacks in there so I wont be adding it to my CV )

With MGStateless set to "@Stateless":

With MGStateless set to "@Stateful":

Thanks once again Raf,

It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!