• Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Why isn't Java's Object class abstract?

 
singh manoj
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Why isn't Java's Object class abstract?
 
Bear Bibeault
Author and ninkuma
Marshal
Pie
Posts: 65218
95
IntelliJ IDE Java jQuery Mac Mac OS X
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
"manoj.java singh", please check your private messages for an important administrative matter.

Also, please take the time to choose the correct forum for your posts. This forum is for questions on JBoss.

For more information, please read this.

This post has been moved to a more appropriate forum.

 
Saifuddin Merchant
Ranch Hand
Posts: 607
Firefox Browser Java Spring
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Maybe it should have been abstract. I have no idea why its not though...
 
Campbell Ritchie
Sheriff
Pie
Posts: 50196
79
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Because plain simple Objects are used by some classes.
 
Saifuddin Merchant
Ranch Hand
Posts: 607
Firefox Browser Java Spring
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Campbell Ritchie wrote:Because plain simple Objects are used by some classes.


They are ... But why? Just curious ...
 
Rob Spoor
Sheriff
Pie
Posts: 20665
65
Chrome Eclipse IDE Java Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Check out this older thread: http://www.coderanch.com/t/432604/Java-General-intermediate/java/Discussion-why-java-lang-Object
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic