Win a copy of Pipeline as Code this week in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
Sheriffs:
  • Rob Spoor
  • Henry Wong
  • Liutauras Vilda
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven
  • Himai Minh
  • Jj Roberts

virgin mother-to-be

 
Wanderer
Posts: 18671
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/12/20/uk.komodo.reut/index.html



It will be too funny if they hatch on Christmas day.
 
Rancher
Posts: 43024
76
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


"It is nature finding a way" sounds like a line straight out of Jurassic Park.
 
Sheriff
Posts: 13411
Firefox Browser VI Editor Redhat
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Inbreeding taken to the extreme.
 
author and iconoclast
Posts: 24203
44
Mac OS X Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In "Jurassic Park", they had to blame frog eggs used as part of the cloning process (I think it was frogs, wasn't it?) for the parthenogenesis. But apparently it happens in many lizard species, too. So in fact this might have happened even if they hadn't used frog eggs. I bet there are a lot of imaginary bioengineers breathing a sigh of relief over this one!
 
author and jackaroo
Posts: 12199
280
Mac IntelliJ IDE Firefox Browser Oracle C++ Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I thought (and I could very well be wrong) that in Jurassic Park they claimed that some of the females changed sex to become males. This also has a counterpart in other species, such as the Blue Groper.

Regards, Andrew
 
Jim Yingst
Wanderer
Posts: 18671
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It's been a while, but my recollection on this seems to match EFH's. There were initially only female dinosaurs, but parthenogenesis allowed the creation of male dinosaurs, who then breeded with the other dinos. So yes it was a surprise to the humans to discover that there were males and they were breeding, but individual dinos weren't changing gender. I think. It is interesting that the whole business about frog DNA may not have been necessary at all.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1241
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hmmm I wonder if this could happen in a human.

Although it may help for the short term survival of a species, it can't be a good tactic in the long run because it would slow down the evolutionary process by offering less chance to mix the genes up.
 
Jim Yingst
Wanderer
Posts: 18671
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Well, if the alternative is for an organism to simply die off without procreating, that would seem to offer even less chance to mix genes up. I agree that in general, sexual reproduction seems to be significantly advantageous, offering better opportunities to discover lucky genetic combinations which lead to greater chances of survival and further procreation. Plus, it's fun. But in the species that have exhibited parthenogenesis so far, it looks like they're quite happy to utilize sexual reproduction when possible... but they (females at least) are capable of parthenogenesis when males are not available. Maybe that's not the best option in general, but it beats dying with no descendants - at least from an evolutionary perspective.
 
Dave Lenton
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1241
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Granted it may be quite good as an emergency survival technique if there are no males around, but in the long term sexual reproduction should be better then asexual reproduction.
 
Jim Yingst
Wanderer
Posts: 18671
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Points we've both just made in the preceding posts, it would seem. Guess that covers it then.
 
Why is the word "abbreviation" so long? And this ad is so short?
SKIP - a book about connecting industrious people with elderly land owners
https://coderanch.com/t/skip-book
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic