If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the others here for?
WC 2007 favorities
I am waiting for this thread to be closed
Originally posted by Pradip Bhat:
1992 WC finalists England failed to make it to 1996 semis.
1996 wc finalists SriLank failed to make it to 1999 semis.
1999 wc finalists Pakistan failed to make it to 2003 semis.
2003 wc finalists India will also fail to make it to 2007 semis.
Originally posted by Srikanth Raghavan:
I bet Mandira Bedi and Chetan Parekh will say the same. Can I add ankur rathi also?
![]()
My blood is tested +ve for Java.
1996 WC finalists Australia reached the finals in 1999 and 2003 and they won both of them, I hope the same for India this time.
If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the others here for?
Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:
Hey don't put me and Ankur in the same as category of Mandira Bedi![]()
SCJP ,SCWCD
Originally posted by Shashikant Dahatonde:
Hi,
The last place is reserved for INDIA.
We cann't except anymore form Team INDIA.
R.N
Originally posted by Rohit Nath:
The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.
-Allan K. Chalmers
You can't say anything about Cricket its a funny game! It all depends on "THE DAY" (days)!
My blood is tested +ve for Java.
Wet dreams don't yield babies.
If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the others here for?
R.N
Originally posted by Rohit Nath:
"The 1983 World Cup was full of dramatic cricket right from the word go with underdogs India and Zimbabwe staging upset victories over the West Indies and Australia, respectively. Along with England, Pakistan and tournament favourites West Indies, India too qualified to the semifinals. India pulled off yet another victory, this time over England to meet the West Indies in the finals."
My blood is tested +ve for Java.
Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:
I am waiting for this thread to be closed![]()
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
Originally posted by Fred Rosenberger:
...and we will not hesitate to yank them if things go south.
SCJP ,SCWCD
Originally posted by Rohitt Vermaa:
Hi fred the passion is because it is the only sport in which our country plays at international level.
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
I was under the impression that India was pretty highly-ranked in field hockey, too. (You probably just call it "hockey" but in Canada "hockey" defaults to ice hockey.)Originally posted by Rohitt Vermaa:
Hi fred the passion is because it is the only sport in which our country plays at international level.
MCSD, SCJP, SCWCD, SCBCD, SCJD (in progress - URLybird 1.2.1)
Originally posted by Fred Rosenberger:
And being passionate is fine. it's when that passion FOR your team turns into HATRED for fans of/players on a DIFFERENT team.
SCJP ,SCWCD
Originally posted by Paul Clapham:
I was under the impression that India was pretty highly-ranked in field hockey, too. (You probably just call it "hockey" but in Canada "hockey" defaults to ice hockey.)
My blood is tested +ve for Java.
Originally posted by Pradip Bhat:
The Indian team has been picked up. Doesn't even look strong on paper.![]()
Mani
Quaerendo Invenietis
Originally posted by Mani Ram:
Hmmm...instead of being so abstract, can you tell us what changes you would make to this team to make it look stronger on paper, and on field?![]()
My blood is tested +ve for Java.
SCJP 5.0, SCWCD 1.4
SCJWSD5 in progress
Originally posted by Adrian Wallace:
Typically - in his recent post match speach after losing the CBA trophy to England he didnt even mention that England had played well and beaten them comprehensively - he just said "We made a few mistakes and thats something we will be able to correct"...
- Varun
Originally posted by David O'Meara:
we'll see what effect bringing Ponting back has.
- Varun
Originally posted by Varun Khanna:
Thing is when you are failing to defend 350 odd scores, little can Ponting return do.