Help coderanch get a
new server
by contributing to the fundraiser
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

limit result through JDBC

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 342
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


I need to go other around 100,000 rows (row has 7 columns from join between tables) in bulk of 500-1000, do my process (around 20 sec for bulk) and take additional bulk ....

My question:

from performance perspective should i leave the result set open or for each bulk create result set and set beginning (by absolute ) at the end of the last bulk row?

I understand that when you use "absolute" the database iterate over all rows until this point , dosnt the database has any algorithm to do this without iterate over all rows?

Thank you
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 8
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi

you can use SQL cached row result set for achive your goal

like :


Arunkumar S
 
avihai marchiano
Ranch Hand
Posts: 342
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If you have 1000 rows in the resultset, so it will copy all rows?
 
author & internet detective
Posts: 41945
911
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Or you could use the SQL query itself to only return the rows you want to each connection is independent. Then you don't have to worry about using resources between requests. You could use rownum or the primary key of your table in the query.
 
All of life is a contant education - Eleanor Roosevelt. Tiny ad:
We need your help - Coderanch server fundraiser
https://coderanch.com/t/782867/Coderanch-server-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic