Forum:

Applets

JavaScript and JApplet

Ranch Hand

Posts: 492

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

Hi

Am invoking a JApplet in the browser and I need to pass few parameters to JApplet init method from the url of the browser.

I tried with getParameter and its not working. Please help me out.

Any way to set the value from java script
<PARAM NAME=Title VALUE="This is a Title String">

Maneesh Godbole

Bartender

Posts: 11497

I like...

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

More suitable in Applet forum.
Moving

[How to ask questions] [Donate a pint, save a life!] [Onff-turn it on!]

Ulf Dittmer

Rancher

Posts: 43081

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

ItDoesntWorkIsUseless. Post the full applet tag, the Java code that tries to retrieve the parameter values, and describe what is happening when it's run.

Meet Gaurav

Ranch Hand

Posts: 492

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

Don't like to hardcode the value in the PARAM tag. Like to pass some values from the url.

Ulf Dittmer

Rancher

Posts: 43081

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

The page can be a JSP/PHP/ASP page, where the parameter value is inserted dynamically on the server; I wouldn't call that "hardcoding". Or is this an environment where server-side processing is not feasible?

So how are you using getParameter, and how is it not working? Or are you no longer using that at all? TellTheDetails

Meet Gaurav

Ranch Hand

Posts: 492

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

This helps me out....This is the only script working in IE and other Browsers

Ulf Dittmer

Rancher

Posts: 43081

posted 15 years ago

Number of slices to send:

Optional 'thank-you' note:

Send

If this page was generated on the server, you could check the cookie there, and put an appropriate value in the param tag. I'd consider that more reliable than using JavaScript.