Originally posted by Raghunandan Mamidala:
Windows Vs Other Operarting Systems
Originally posted by Bear Bibeault:
The "other" presupposes that Windows is an Operarting [sic] System...
Originally posted by marc weber:
I think this was meant to read, "Windows vs. Other Malware."
I consider Windows itself a virus that people willingly install on their PCs.Originally posted by Pat Farrell:
I always considered Windows a carrier. Like Typhoid Mary of folklore, Windows is a malware/virus/spyware transfer vector.
"The differential equations that describe dynamic interactions of power generators are similar to that of the gravitational interplay among celestial bodies, which is chaotic in nature."
Originally posted by Nicholas Jordan:
There has been actual, serious discussion of writing a Java Centric Operating System, ... some work has likely already been accomplished.
Spot false dilemmas now, ask me how!
(If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
I am waiting waiting and still waiting... for a long time for a byte code aware Microprocessors... but it is yet to come out of sun micro system.
Sai Surya, SCJP 5.0, SCWCD 5.0, IBM 833 834
http://sai-surya-talk.blogspot.com, I believe in Murphy's law.
I want to be like marc
Originally posted by Arvind Birla:
People are generally jealous of MS's success but don't think about how the IT industry would be decades behind what it is now had it not been for...
"We're kind of on the level of crossword puzzle writers... And no one ever goes to them and gives them an award." ~Joe Strummer
sscce.org
Originally posted by Arvind Birla:
...Hundreds of millions of people put their trust in MS so they must be doing something good. Other companies like Sun, Apple etc. dont have significant market share because they just aren't that good...
"We're kind of on the level of crossword puzzle writers... And no one ever goes to them and gives them an award." ~Joe Strummer
sscce.org
Originally posted by Arvind Birla:
Hundreds of millions of people put their trust in MS so they must be doing something good.
Originally posted by Pat Farrell:
I don't know what is the proper new language. Candidates could include things that generate byte-code, like Scala, or something completely new. Or oldies like smalltalk or lisp
"The differential equations that describe dynamic interactions of power generators are similar to that of the gravitational interplay among celestial bodies, which is chaotic in nature."
Originally posted by Arvind Birla:
People are generally jealous of MS's success but don't think about how the IT industry would be decades behind what it is now had it not been for. Hundreds of millions of people put their trust in MS so they must be doing something good.
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
Originally posted by Arvind Birla:People are generally jealous of MS's success
Originally posted by Bert Bates:
"Operating systems... should"
Originally posted by Sai Surya:
Will Install Needless Data On Whole System
[ June 04, 2008: Message edited by: Sai Surya ]
Originally posted by Raghunandan Mamidala:
(...snip...)Well am i making some point here ?(..snip...)
"The differential equations that describe dynamic interactions of power generators are similar to that of the gravitational interplay among celestial bodies, which is chaotic in nature."
Originally posted by Raghunandan Mamidala:
Well then why is some one not able to make a nice operating system as per defination
Originally posted by marc weber:
What exactly did Microsoft offer that was so unique and extraordinary to enable such a leap?
also, hundreds of millions of people don't have a CHOICE but to use MS - that doesn't mean they TRUST them.
The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking which created them – Einstein
SCJP 1.5, SCWCD, SCBCD in the making
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Originally posted by Jesper Young:
GUIs were not invented by Microsoft and existed long before Windows.
I had an Amiga with a nice graphical OS, for example, years before Windows was released.
Originally posted by Raghunandan Mamidala:
Well then why is some one not able to make a nice operating system as per defination and get that in ..,
Well am i making some point here ? there are so many technolgoes emerging why arent they able to compete and challenge microsoft's technical and marketing strategies, I am not against or for microsoft
Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:
Windows was neither unique nor extraordinary.
GUI were present before windows and maybe a much better offering but they were not mass marketed. Others took the path of perfection while MS sold to a wider audience
Originally posted by Devesh H Rao:
GUI were present before windows and maybe a much better offering but they were not mass marketed.
Originally posted by abhishek pendkay:
Agreed that hundreds of millions of people don't really trust MS, but why didn't these people have a choice...
Originally posted by abhishek pendkay:
MS did not stop others from making an OS...
Originally posted by abhishek pendkay:
other companies just couldn't stand the competetion from MS
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
Originally posted by marc weber:
The IT industry would be decades behind if it weren't for Microsoft? What exactly did Microsoft offer that was so unique and extraordinary to enable such a leap?
I want to be like marc
Originally posted by Arvind Birla:
I'm convinced had it not been for Microsoft, the internet wouldn't even exist as we know it today.
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
Honk if you love justice! And honk twice for tiny ads!
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com
|