• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • paul wheaton
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

Column index not populated?

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I've been following the example in "2.4.6.2.3. Bidirectional association with indexed collections" but I still don't get any population of the index column, any suggestions would be appreciated:





I can't see where I'm going wrong. The childOrder exists so mappedBy can be used on the parent side, right?
(I also posted this on the hib forums but as your slogan says, you have a tendency of being more friendly over here)
 
Nicklas Karlsson
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
OK, gave up on the mappedBy and went for joincolumns and that seemed to work. Now for the next step, composite keys, I modifed the example as









The problem is that I'm trying to get it to work against a legacy schema and I have uses for the childOrder so I'd like it to be part of the key but I get a



even If I try to do so in the embedded key. Can't the column index be pointed against a column/property that is "non-synthetic"?

Suggestions appreciated
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic