This week's book giveaways are in the Jython/Python and Object-Oriented programming forums.
We're giving away four copies each of Machine Learning for Business: Using Amazon SageMaker and Jupyter and Object Design Style Guide and have the authors on-line!
See this thread and this one for details.
Win a copy of Machine Learning for Business: Using Amazon SageMaker and JupyterE this week in the Jython/Python forum
or Object Design Style Guide in the Object-Oriented programming forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Knute Snortum
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Joe Ess
  • salvin francis
  • fred rosenberger

Go language -- Google's new language

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hey Ranchers,

Yet another language in the race. Just check it out . http://golang.org/

It seems to be "C" with "Garbage Collection"! Does nt it sound cool?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 174
Java ME Opera Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
what is better? java or go?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 10192
3
Mac PPC Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I heard that Google was doing yet another language called Noop. Now I'm seeing another one here...
 
Raghavan Muthu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Jothi Shankar Kumar wrote:I heard that Google was doing yet another language called Noop. Now I'm seeing another one here...



Was it so? News to me. Of late, I have been seeing/hearing so many languages like fan, haskell, erlang, and recently today 'go'! huh...
 
Raghavan Muthu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Zandis Murāns wrote:what is better? java or go?



I don't think you can straight away compare 'go' against Java at this moment as it is on its early stage!! I guess they both target a different set of audience.

It looks tempting that soon after hearing the term 'Garbage Collection', we would get it linked with Java as it has been the one promisingly giving this feature for these many years.

Still, there are few more keywords to consider it in the race are : 'Platform Independence', 'WORA - Write Once Run Anywhere' :)
 
Rancher
Posts: 43011
76
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

what is better? java or go?


That question is too general to be answered in a meaningful way. For instance, one could say that Go is better than Java because its name can be typed faster.
 
Raghavan Muthu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Ulf Dittmer wrote:
That question to too general to be answered in a meaningful way. For instance, one could say that Go is better than Java because its name can be typed faster.



Different but agreeable dimension Ulf :)
 
Joe Harry
Ranch Hand
Posts: 10192
3
Mac PPC Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Whatever languages come I'm sure that it might take quite some time in years for those languages to be used like how java is being used today.
 
Marshal
Posts: 67343
173
Mac Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE jQuery Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I thought sure that they'd have named it Gava.
 
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Bear Bibeault wrote:I thought sure that they'd have named it Gava.



Its not aimed at Java. Its aimed straight at C. And from what I can see, does a good job of showing that C is 40 years old and needs to be replaced to reflect current practices and hardware.
 
Rancher
Posts: 3419
34
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Bear Bibeault wrote:I thought sure that they'd have named it Gava.


Have you seen Guava? It's a library, not a language, but the point is the name is close - and I doubt they'd ever use the name Gava if they've already got Guava, as they're too close. Guava is very cool - I expect it to become very widely used within a year.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Mike Simmons wrote:Have you seen Guava? It's a library, not a language



Is there really a Guava yet? I've been using Google Collections, and love them, and they are the first major part of Guava, but so far, the site you link to is short on things like .jar files to download, javadocs, etc.
 
Mike Simmons
Rancher
Posts: 3419
34
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Raghavan Muthu wrote:

Jothi Shankar Kumar wrote:I heard that Google was doing yet another language called Noop. Now I'm seeing another one here...



Was it so? News to me. Of late, I have been seeing/hearing so many languages like fan, haskell, erlang, and recently today 'go'! huh...



You can read more about Noop here - or see our previous discussion here. It looks like Noop isn't so much a language from Google as it is a set of ideas for a language, for some people who work at Google. It's not an official Google release of any sort, just a side project from some people there. Who knows, it could become something big, but so far, there's little there to get excited about, in my opinion.
 
Mike Simmons
Rancher
Posts: 3419
34
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Pat Farrell wrote:

Mike Simmons wrote:Have you seen Guava? It's a library, not a language



Is there really a Guava yet? I've been using Google Collections, and love them, and they are the first major part of Guava, but so far, the site you link to is short on things like .jar files to download, javadocs, etc.



Well, it's not nearly as far along as Google Collections, yet. But there's a bit more than you seem to have found. The javadoc is here. I don't see any jar files to download, but you can download their source and build it:

>svn checkout http://guava-libraries.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ guava-libraries-read-only
>cd guava-libraries-read-only
>ant

As they note, things are still in a state of flux, and I wouldn't recommend using Guava in anything you want to put into production. Yet. But what's there so far looks very promising to me.
 
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What the web framework of Go language will be named?
Go on Goal
Go in Google
Way to Go
 
Mike Simmons
Rancher
Posts: 3419
34
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I propose Goop.

On the other hand, Google's Go is predated by the unrelated languauge Go! by Francis McCabe. As a result, Google may end up changing the name to something else. So maybe the framework designers should hold off a bit on choosing a name.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 177
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Wow I missed so much activity on 'Go' !! Sorry for not searching before posting!
 
Kavita Tipnis
Ranch Hand
Posts: 177
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I read that this is one of the 20% projects of Google, I wonder if they have plans to develop Chrome OS using 'Go'.

Mike Simmons wrote:
On the other hand, Google's Go is predated by the unrelated languauge Go! by Francis McCabe. As a result, Google may end up changing the name to something else. So maybe the framework designers should hold off a bit on choosing a name.


I would like to add this
'Google 'Go' Name Brings Accusations Of 'Evil' '
http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/web_services/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221601351&subSection=Software

A cheesy irony I found in the article, 'Google, for all its search prowess, appears to have been unaware of McCabe's Go!. '

I would suggest BingGO!
 
Java Cowboy
Posts: 16084
88
Android Scala IntelliJ IDE Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I must admit that I've looked at Go for only about 15 minutes, but one thing that I didn't like about it is the syntax.

For example, the way variables are declared with var name type;. Why did they have to invent this backward syntax with first the name, and then the type, separated by a space - exactly the other way around from C, and unlike any other programming language? Or the way you declare an array:

Why such a strange and backward syntax? You'd think that it would be smart to re-use the familiar syntax of the existing major languages (C, C++, Java, C# etc.) so that it will be easier to learn for most programmers. It almost looks like they were deliberately stubborn and wanted to be unique for no good reason.

We'll see if it ever becomes a success. There is a lot of hype, but that's only because it comes from The Big Almighty Google. It will have to prove itself in practice.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Jesper Young wrote: I didn't like about it is the syntax.
Why such a strange and backward syntax?



Who knows? who cares? a lot of languages have a ton of syntactic sugar that just appeals to programmers in the first 15 minutes. Bliss used "begin" and "end' rather than braces. In a bit of real use, the syntax loses all importance.

Its the merger of functional and sequential programming and ease of use in massively multi-core systems that I find interesting.

I stopped caring about syntax about 20 languages ago.
 
Raghavan Muthu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Jesper Young wrote:I must admit that I've looked at Go for only about 15 minutes, but one thing that I didn't like about it is the syntax.

For example, the way variables are declared with var name type;. Why did they have to invent this backward syntax with first the name, and then the type, separated by a space - exactly the other way around from C, and unlike any other programming language? Or the way you declare an array:

Why such a strange and backward syntax? You'd think that it would be smart to re-use the familiar syntax of the existing major languages (C, C++, Java, C# etc.) so that it will be easier to learn for most programmers. It almost looks like they were deliberately stubborn and wanted to be unique for no good reason.

We'll see if it ever becomes a success. There is a lot of hype, but that's only because it comes from The Big Almighty Google. It will have to prove itself in practice.



I second Jesper's thoughts exactly here. All what matters and should be focussed is the 'ease of use' and not 'difficulties and strange behavior just for the sake of uniqueness'!
 
Raghavan Muthu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Pat Farrell wrote:

Jesper Young wrote: I didn't like about it is the syntax.
Why such a strange and backward syntax?



Who knows? who cares?



A huge set of people called 'developers' or 'end users' of the language. Whats the whole point in developing a language/system which the users find it very difficult? Would not the very main purpose of it go for a toss?

a lot of languages have a ton of syntactic sugar that just appeals to programmers in the first 15 minutes. Bliss used "begin" and "end' rather than braces.



Agree with it slightly. i too have felt the same when I looked at Ruby as due to the fact the heavy and tight bound nature of braces nearly a decade


In a bit of real use, the syntax loses all importance.



Then we can all better program in Assembly Programming Language - ALP which ultimately the processor is really caring about


I stopped caring about syntax about 20 languages ago.



20 languages ago? Don't quite get you here.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Raghavan Muthu wrote:A huge set of people called 'developers' or 'end users' of the language. Whats the whole point in developing a language/system which the users find it very difficult? Would not the very main purpose of it go for a toss?



Any language that is designed for professional development is going to be different that prior languages, or it will be called Java++ or something that indicates its nothing more than a small change to an existing language. Then again, some languages just change and don't change the name, Perl is famous for this.

Raghavan Muthu wrote:Then we can all better program in Assembly Programming Language - ALP which ultimately the processor is really caring about



Nonsense. Many current CPU designs don't use assembly as their lowest level. As I wrote up thread, GO is aimed at system applications, just as C and BLISS were in the 70s.

Most languages look like Algol. But there is no requirement to look the way we are "used" to seeing them. Again, a professional developer will learn the language in a week, and then the syntax is invisible.

Raghavan Muthu wrote:

I stopped caring about syntax about 20 languages ago.


20 languages ago? Don't quite get you here.



I've lost track of how many languages I've used professionally, but I was on my fourth or fifth well before 1980. I don't know for sure, but I've used 30 or 40 over the years. Languages fall out of favor, if you want to keep working, you learn the next one. After you have learned to use three or four, picking up a new one takes very little time.

I will grant that to be fully fluent in a language takes time, you have to use it. But more often than not, that is not the language per-se, but the library and idioms. Java can be fully described in ten pages, its the libraries and application frameworks that fill your shelf.

If you think Java and C are the only languages that are ever going to be used in your career, you will have a short career.


 
Why does your bag say "bombs"? The reason I ask is that my bag says "tiny ads" and it has stuff like this:
Java file APIs (DOC, XLS, PDF, and many more)
https://products.aspose.com/total/java
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!