Win a copy of Head First Android this week in the Android forum!
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
• Tim Cooke
• Campbell Ritchie
• Paul Clapham
• Ron McLeod
• Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
• Jeanne Boyarsky
• Rob Spoor
• Bear Bibeault
Saloon Keepers:
• Jesse Silverman
• Tim Moores
• Stephan van Hulst
• Tim Holloway
• Carey Brown
Bartenders:
• Piet Souris
• Al Hobbs
• salvin francis

# Insertion Point Question on binarySearch()

Ranch Hand
Posts: 92
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:

Results are:

four one three two
one = 1
--- reverse ---
two three one four
one = -1
one = 2

Why "-1"?

Greenhorn
Posts: 24
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:
The reason for the -1 is because binary search was not called using the same comparator that was used to
sort the array. According to the Sierra and Bates book, this will give an unpredictable result, in this case -1.
I am not sure why exactly -1, i.e what algorithm went wrong etc. But I don't think you need to go in to such depth
for the exam. Just remember that to use binary search on an array that is not sorted using natural order,you need
to use the comparator that was used to sort the array, otherwise the result will be unpredictable.

Martin

Sheriff
Posts: 11604
178
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:
Hi Erap,

Martin is spot-on and why it returns -1 is not explained, not in the K&B-book, not in the javadoc of the binarySearch-method. It just states that the result is undefined when the array is not sorted (or sorted with another comparator).

Kind regards,
Roel