• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Java Generics

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 495
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Does using generics as in List<String> improve performance

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1183
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
as opposed to what ? Using arrays ? Using non-parameterized Collections ?

It should not make any difference if you use parameterized classes or not, since the parameters are only compile time relevant and are stripped away at compilation time. At runtime, the program won't know about the parameter and put it casts everywhere.

Hope that helped.
 
Sheriff
Posts: 22784
131
Eclipse IDE Spring VI Editor Chrome Java Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sebastian is right, at runtime generics no longer exist. They only exist during runtime to help prevent runtime exceptions (most notably ClassCastException).
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic