• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • paul wheaton
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Ron McLeod
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Scott Selikoff
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
  • Mikalai Zaikin
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown

Webworks Vs Struts

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 124
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,
Could someone please help me in taking a decision between using WebWorks and Struts as the WebApp Framework for our J2EE Applications.
If these have already been compared elsewhere, those links would also help.
Thanks
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2713
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Moving to the Struts and Other Frameworks forum...
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Possibly a bit biased since it is from the WebWork site but....
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Struts+vs.+WebWork
 
Sheriff
Posts: 6450
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Gregg Bolinger:
Possibly a bit biased since it is from the WebWork site but....


Possibly? That seems to be a horribly biased piece imho. For one, the author admits in several places that he doesn't know much about certain parts of Struts, and at one point asks leading questions about part of the framework that he doesn't understand apparently attempting to influence the reader to draw a conclusion.
I don't know a thing about WebWorks, however from reading that comparison what I get out of it is that Struts uses standard J2EE mechanisms (Servlets, JSTL-EL, etc...) and WebWorks often does not. That's fine, but to try to spin it that these mechanisms are somehow bad seems a bit odd.
Overall, it looks like just a piece of marketing attempting to convince people to use their product instead of the de facto standard.
 
Chris Mathews
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2713
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Jason Menard:
I don't know a thing about WebWorks, however from reading that comparison what I get out of it is that Struts uses standard J2EE mechanisms (Servlets, JSTL-EL, etc...) and WebWorks often does not. That's fine, but to try to spin it that these mechanisms are somehow bad seems a bit odd.


I disagree with you on this point. The only place where WebWork is less standard than Struts is in regard to JSTL. WebWork prefers OGNL over JSTL though you could always use the latter if you really want. Other than that WebWork is every bit as standards compliant as Struts... the WebWork team just doesn't believe in being explicitly dependent on Servlets/JSP even though that is the technology that the majority of XWork/WebWork projects will run on.

Originally posted by Jason Menard:
Overall, it looks like just a piece of marketing attempting to convince people to use their product instead of the de facto standard.


Of course this is exactly what it is. However, this doesn't mean that there is no techinical merit to the arguments present... because there is.
 
Don't mess with me you fool! I'm cooking with gas! Here, read this tiny ad:
Smokeless wood heat with a rocket mass heater
https://woodheat.net
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic