• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Part II Query on solving problem domain

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 33
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

I have some confusions on the solution approach. Please corret me if I'm wrong in the following.

(i) If certain cardinalities, relationships are unclear in the given BDM , can we fix those problem areas by identifying and providing valid assumption as the solution or can it be only solved through UML diagram?

(ii)Can I make the changes(ex: In order management domain, changing the entity 'manufacturer' as attribute to 'product' entity) in the given BDM entities in order to depict them properly in class diagram solution?

(iii)Does the assumption point get marked if solution is not fully shown in UML compliance or it lead to failure of whole deliverables?

Kindly share your suggestions.

Regards,
Riyaz
 
Ew. You guys are ugly with a capital UG. Here, maybe this tiny ad can help:
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic