• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Pomodoro Technique

 
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hey,
Have you ever employed the Pomodoro Technique?
Do you have any stories to share?
Thanks.
 
Author
Posts: 12617
IntelliJ IDE Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Stories about "working for a relatively short amount of time then taking a break"? What kind of stories could there possibly be?

In any case, I worked for a pure agile company (pair programming 95% of the time) that employed poms (of the non-Maven variety). The length was slightly variable, between 30-45 minutes depending on what was being worked on. Even the interview was timed with poms. It worked pretty well.

There's neuro research showing the brain works best in a ~45-minute burst (followed by a dip in productivity, then another 20-30 minute period of less efficiency than the first). Even without a timer, I try to follow that in whatever I'm doing. For example, when learning new material, I'll hit it hard for 45 minutes, take a 5-minute break, then use the "followup period" to review what I just learned.

The physical benefits alone make it worthwhile, though, especially in light of the new research showing that just sitting down all day is a health risk: getting up and moving around, rehydrating, etc. (I also do light stretching, and back when I had an office, light exercise/yoga) is critical for both mental performance and physical health.
 
author & internet detective
Posts: 41860
908
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I've read about it and tried in limited doses at home. (At work, I have trouble being able to carve out dedicated time.) It was an interesting experiment at home, but it didn't take hold. I think because it isn't a "real" project.

At work, I do work at peak efficiency for 45-60 minutes. And on quiet/interruption free days, it ends up happening. But I don't plan for it.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 754
Eclipse IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

David Newton wrote:For example, when learning new material, I'll hit it hard for 45 minutes, take a 5-minute break, then use the "followup period" to review what I just learned.

The physical benefits alone make it worthwhile, though, especially in light of the new research showing that just sitting down all day is a health risk: getting up and moving around, rehydrating, etc. (I also do light stretching, and back when I had an office, light exercise/yoga) is critical for both mental performance and physical health.



Haha, I was doing this without knowing that it has Pomodoro name... It's no use to stay for hours looking the same thing... I bought i little bottle of water so I drink a lot (and have to go to the bathroom all the time =P)! We must relax our mind!
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic