• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Rob Spoor
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Tim Moores
  • Jesse Silverman
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven

Griffon vs RCP

 
author
Posts: 32
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I know Griffon is supposed to be like the Rails of desktop development, but what advantages does it offer over something like Spring RCP or Eclipse RCP? If I still have to code all the swing for things like window layout and docking, am I really gaining anything?
 
author
Posts: 47
VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Griffon differs from an RCP solution in the sense that it does not force you to choose an specific layout or application profile from the get go. Griffon also lets you build and deploy an application in 3 modes: standalone, applet and webstart. Because of that the core is very slim. Applications can be enhanced by installing plugins.

It is certainly possible to build an RCP solution on top of griffon, that is, create a set of plugins that:
- provide an specific application archetype
- docking options
- domain classes
- validation
- view scaffolding

Work on some of those plugins is already underway.

Cheers,
Andres
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic