Help coderanch get a
new server
by contributing to the fundraiser
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Singleton ThreadSafe

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 198
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
How to make singleton Object without using syncronization code in getInstance() method.

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 479
1
IntelliJ IDE Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

If the signature of getInstance() method for the singleton is of the form:-



the method is thread safe due to the synchronized keyword taking care of concurrency issues. Drop the 'synchronized' and your getInstance() is potentially liable for creation of multiple instances due to concurrent invocation by multiple threads.

Cheers,
Raj.
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
To make your singleton, you can use a static initializer in your singleton.



To use it safely, you still have to make sure that the class remains threadsafe once you start adding functionality.
 
Mohammed Yousuff
Ranch Hand
Posts: 198
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
the above code loads the instance while startup, what if we need a lazy initialization, means we need to create the instance when client calls the getInstance() ... In that case we should not use synchronize the getInstance().... Any thoughts....???
 
Brice Giesbrecht
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Using the static initializer does actually cause synchronization but it is implicit and done by the jvm during the class loading and initialization routine. So, you could say I sort of cheated by suggesting that.

To guarantee that only one process is executing in the critical section of your method that will be doing the actual initialization (like getInstance), somewhere down the line you will need to use synchronization explicitly (or implicitly like the static init). You can bury it using many layers but it will be there.

I am curious about the aversion to using synchronization. Can you provide a little info on that?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 263
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
You can find more info in the link below.

http://shivendra-tripathi.blogspot.com/2010/01/singleton-pattern.html
 
You got style baby! More than this tiny ad:
We need your help - Coderanch server fundraiser
https://coderanch.com/t/782867/Coderanch-server-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic