• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • paul wheaton
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

About type and class attribute of jsp usebean

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
But this is what I think about type and class

type =" myType" class ="myClass"

basically means


myType myBean= new myClass();

Please corret me anyone if I am wrong
I am just on slow/fast learning curve
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 633
Android Eclipse IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
yes you are right


type==reference type
class==object type
 
Oprah Thaddeus
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Pramod P Deore wrote:yes you are right


type==reference type
class==object type



So was I right or wrong?
 
Pramod P Deore
Ranch Hand
Posts: 633
Android Eclipse IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
yes you are right

type can store object of class.
 
Sheriff
Posts: 67754
173
Mac Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE jQuery TypeScript Java iOS
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Almost. It's not always true that a new bean will be created.
 
Oprah Thaddeus
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Bear Bibeault wrote:Almost. It's not always true that a new bean will be created.



Now I am confused. Example please
 
Bear Bibeault
Sheriff
Posts: 67754
173
Mac Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE jQuery TypeScript Java iOS
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
If a bean is already bound in the specified scope with the same name, it will be attached. A new bean is created only if one does not already exist.
 
Oprah Thaddeus
Ranch Hand
Posts: 72
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Bear Bibeault wrote:If a bean is already bound in the specified scope with the same name, it will be attached. A new bean is created only if one does not already exist.



You mean the body of the useBean will be executed iff bean DOES NOT exist in the scope. Am I right?
 
Sheriff
Posts: 9708
43
Android Google Web Toolkit Hibernate IntelliJ IDE Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Basically what Bear is saying is
Will not always mean
If there is a bean named whatever in page scope, then a new instance of myClass will not be created. Also the bean in the page scope might not be of type myClass...
 
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Posts: 3412
320
Android Eclipse IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I think what Bear tries to say is that if the object is already in any scope, it will not be created with the jsp:useBean statement. Consequently if you have one or more jsp:setProperties as an body of the jsp:useBean (and the object is already in scope), those setters won't be called.

regards,
Frits
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic