How about when someone accepts acclaim for work, clearly done by one someone else, as their own?
How about twisting statistics to fabricate project success in a less than truthful manner?
How about under-reporting the number of hours you spent on a deliverable?
How about passive-aggressively undermining a project/person/strategy because it conflicts with your own?
I've witnessed these practices even in the best of organizations. While ruthless may be too harsh a
word, I view them all immoral if done pre-meditatively.
That said, I'm as perpelexed as Henry as to why someone would pose this question (unless I've misunderstood the premise).