• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • paul wheaton
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Piet Souris
Bartenders:

Error from sudoku class

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 16
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This is my code about SUDOKU
I got this error and don't know what it is.





 
Sheriff
Posts: 3064
12
Mac IntelliJ IDE Python VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
When you initialize the suds array:

SudCell suds[][] = new SudCell[NUM_VALS][NUM_VALS];

that creates a two-dimensional array of nulls. That's an important point to remember with Java. When you try to work with one of those values, you instantly get a NullPointerException. You need to instantiate each element of the array using "new SudCell()" before you reference it.
 
Nattakan Lukkanapinit
Greenhorn
Posts: 16
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Why i can't just call like this



 
Marshal
Posts: 80661
478
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Never use == true or == false. Use if (xxx) or if (!xxx)
 
Sheriff
Posts: 22849
132
Eclipse IDE Spring Chrome Java Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Hong hong wrote:Why i can't just call like this


Because that calls suds[x][y].SetToBlank(); for each array element, but these are still all null as Greg said. In your constructor you need to add a block to initialize the array elements: suds[x][y] = new SudCell();
 
Bartender
Posts: 1561
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
cross-post: java-forums thread
 
Rob Spoor
Sheriff
Posts: 22849
132
Eclipse IDE Spring Chrome Java Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hong hong, please BeForthrightWhenCrosspostingToOtherSites.
 
Author
Posts: 12617
IntelliJ IDE Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
A few comments:

Java naming conventions: Standard Java naming conventions include starting method and variable names with a lower-case letter. Doing otherwise makes code more difficult to read than necessary.

Simplify logic expressions:Code organization: Put separate classes in separate files. To do otherwise obfuscates the logical separation of functionality, and makes navigation more difficult than necessary on both editing and cognitive levels.

Simplify flow: Consider your boolean RuleOut(int) method: first, every single path returns false. You only need one return, outside of any conditional. Second, pay attention to what you're doing: do you see any relationship between the val being passed in and the array index you're setting? This is a two-line method, unless the logic is completely wrong--which is possible, because a boolean method that always returns false doesn't need to return *anything*.

Particularly when trying to get help from people it's really important to keep things as simple, clear, and concise as possible. For your *own* benefit as well--code that's easy to read is easier to debug, understand, explain, extend, etc.
 
David Newton
Author
Posts: 12617
IntelliJ IDE Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
You're going to get a lot more errors--you're trying to test things that are going to throw runtime exceptions.

Right now it seems to me like you wrote everything at once without running *anything* -- the main method isn't going to get passed the forcedSet(-1) line before crashing.

Start small. Test as you go. Look for ways to simplify what you're doing--don't just blindly throw code at a problem without taking the time to reflect on what you've just written. Be consistent in conventions. Localize functionality. Make sure you're not doing more work than necessary; simple example:Here you're both not being consistent and doing more work than necessary--if the valuePresent(1) call is going to print correctly, why bother with the Boolean.toString(...) wrapping of the others? (And consider printf :)

I'm finding the code very difficult to follow as I bang on it, it's not clear to me what the intent of many things are. These things are fixable without a huge amount of effort.
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic