• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Stateful EJB3 was removed or timed out

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi, i have this problem in WebSphere 7 with EJB3,
I have a EJB project with one stateful ejb and one statelss ejb, and a web project with references to the two ejbs,
also i configured the WebSphere Bindings in the References of the web project.
When is when i start using the stateful ejb this exception rise:
[5/28/10 14:57:25:672 UYT] 00000017 SystemOut O 2010-05-28 14:57:25,672 ERROR [WebContainer : 2] common.contract.ejb3.SessionBeanLocalCaller - Excepcion : javax.ejb.NoSuchEJBException: Stateful bean BeanId(Regularizaciones#RegularizacionesEJB3.jar#RegularizacionesStateFulEJB, DF457FA6-0128-4000-E000-0E74C0A8EA3B) was removed or timed out.

And when this error produces, i can do any of the stateful flows, because this exception raises,
the question is, why the container not destroy this instance of the stateful, or why don't create a new one?

Thanks.
 
Hebert Tourne
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The question is:

When this error produces, i canĀ“t do any of the stateful flows, because this exception raises,
why the container do not destroy this instance of the stateful, or why don't create a new one?
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic