His reviews are always funny, but rarely useful. Show me a single game he's reviewed in the last 2 years that he didn't piss all over, and I'll give him some cred. The way he stays relevent is by telling us everything wrong with every game. There's always something wrong with every game. That's easy. Talking that fast while reading a script is probably somewhat difficult.
How about just using the more common gaming review sites, like IGN and Gamepro? They tend to be pretty accurate for me. And I believe they may also allow users to rate along too, so you can see what the mass is thinking about it too.
For this game, both sites are reporting pretty good reviews, which is expected, based on the fact that it is a Rockstar game, and the ridiculous amount of marketing that seemed to have be spent on it (you don't waste money marketing bad games).
Aaaaaaaaaanyway, on the subject of games, nothing - and I do mean NOTHING - interest me beyond the release of Deus Ex 3.
The original being my favorite game of all time. Weird though they went from Deus Ex to Deus Ex 3, skipping part 2.
Because that game was never released as a dissapointing sequel. Nope, doesn't exist. Never made.
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
You showed up just in time for the waffles! And this tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop