• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Question from the scjp book

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 25
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,
I came across a question, and was unable to understand the solution for the question.
Here it is..

Given:


Which statement(s), inserted at line 7, will compile? (Choose all that apply.)
A. Flower getType() { return this; }
B. String getType() { return "this"; }
C. Plant getType() { return this; }
D. Tulip getType() { return new Tulip(); }

The answer is A,C, and D.
and B is incorrect.

However i want to know WHY B is incorrect?
 
in.anurag Singh
Greenhorn
Posts: 25
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It was from the Kathie Sierra SCJP 5 Study Guide.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 492
Firefox Browser VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Well flower extends from Plant right?
So Flower inherits all of the methods and attributes from Plants.
This means that Flower already has a getType() method and the the return signature of that method is type Plant not String.
So String getType() causes an error.

Sun has a good description of this here:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/IandI/override.html

Hunter
 
in.anurag Singh
Greenhorn
Posts: 25
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
means,
A and D are correct because they declare and return sub-types of the Super Class Plant type.
C is correct because it is correctly overriding the method getType();
B is incorrect because it is returning "String" which is not a sub-type of Super Class Plant Type.

I want to know, If I am correct..
 
Hunter McMillen
Ranch Hand
Posts: 492
Firefox Browser VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

in.anurag Singh wrote:means,
A and D are correct because they declare and return sub-types of the Super Class Plant type.
C is correct because it is correctly overriding the method getType();
B is incorrect because it is returning "String" which is not a sub-type of Super Class Plant Type.

I want to know, If I am correct..



Does everything you typed here look correct to you? Does it compile when you try it?

Hunter
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic