• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
Sheriffs:
  • Knute Snortum
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • salvin francis
Bartenders:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Frits Walraven
  • Pete Letkeman

why an abstract class is faster than an interface ?  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 5575
Eclipse IDE Java Windows XP
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Friends,
I come across *abstract classes may be a tiny bit faster (or they may not.) * in this page [JavaRanch.]
http://faq.javaranch.com/java/InterfaceVsAbstractClass

I want to know the reason for why abstract classes may be a tiny bit faster ?

Thanks.
 
author and iconoclast
Sheriff
Posts: 24220
40
Chrome Eclipse IDE Mac OS X
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In Java's early days, there was a technical reason for the difference. Do you know what a "virtual table" or "vtbl" is? Basically, a simple vtbl could be used for directly inherited methods, and so the JVM just had to look at two pointers to find the code for a method inherited from an abstract class -- that's relatively fast. But since any class can implement any number of interfaces, finding the code that implements an interface method would involve following a pointer to a table of interfaces implemented by a class, then searching through the table to find a vtbl for the implementation of that interface, and then finding the method pointer in the table. That's obviously a lot more work, so calling an interface method used to be measurably slower.

These days, JVMs are a lot smarter, and most of this sort of lookup is done during dynamic compilation, so the runtime differences are small or nonexistent.
 
Seetharaman Venkatasamy
Ranch Hand
Posts: 5575
Eclipse IDE Java Windows XP
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thank you very much Ernest for your valuable points!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!