This week's book giveaway is in the Agile and Other Processes forum.
We're giving away four copies of The Journey To Enterprise Agility and have Daryl Kulak & Hong Li on-line!
See this thread for details.
Win a copy of The Journey To Enterprise Agility this week in the Agile and Other Processes forum! And see the welcome thread for 20% off.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Bear Bibeault
Sheriffs:
  • Paul Clapham
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Knute Snortum
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Moores
  • Pete Letkeman
  • Stephan van Hulst
Bartenders:
  • Carey Brown
  • Tim Holloway
  • Joe Ess

String and String Object Problem  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 100
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


When I run this
OUTPUT:
F
F
F
T
F
F
F
F

Please Explain Why s3 is not == s4 and s3 is not == s5
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 91
Notepad
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
just check how many String objects are created
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2066
Clojure IntelliJ IDE Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Gari Jain wrote:

Please Explain Why s3 is not == s4 and s3 is not == s5



Because, s1 and s2 are in the heap, not in the String literal pool, and the object, you've created as s3 is also in the heap. And s4 and s5 are in the String literal pool (One object "abcxyz", two references, s4 and s5).
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Gari Jain wrote:Please Explain Why s3 is not == s4 and s3 is not == s5


Abimaran Kugathasan wrote:Because, s1 and s2 are in the heap, not in the String literal pool, and the object, you've created as s3 is also in the heap. And s4 and s5 are in the String literal pool (One object "abcxyz", two references, s4 and s5).


Surely all strings are still allocated on the heap? See Javaranch Also as per SCJP guide (Kathy & Bert),

When the compiler encounters a String literal, it checks the pool to sec if an identical String already exists. If a match is found, the reference to the new literal is directed to the existing String, and no new String literal object is created.


"String literal pool" is the key here. s4 & s5 contain reference to same object ("abcxyz" string literal is in the pool). And == looks at the bit pattern (in this case) and bit battern of s4 & s5 is same. s3 is not part of the pool and contains reference to different string object, so bit pattern is different than s4 & s5 and == fails.

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 634
Chrome Eclipse IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

When the compiler encounters a String literal, it checks the pool to sec if an identical String already exists. If a match is found, the reference to the new literal is directed to the existing String, and no new String literal object is created.




"String literal pool" is the key here. s4 & s5 contain reference to same object ("abcxyz" string literal is in the pool). And == looks at the bit pattern (in this case) and bit battern of s4 & s5 is same. s3 is not part of the pool and contains reference to different string object, so bit pattern is different than s4 & s5 and == fail



why s3 is not part of the pool ?
once

is executed,i think s3 will refer to a object "abcxyz"
then we

 
Abimaran Kugathasan
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2066
Clojure IntelliJ IDE Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

mohitkumar gupta wrote:

why s3 is not part of the pool ?
once

is executed,i think s3 will refer to a object "abcxyz"



Since, the s1 and s2 are in the heap, the object s3 is also in the heap. Read more about String Literal pool in this link.
 
Mohit G Gupta
Ranch Hand
Posts: 634
Chrome Eclipse IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
i read the link Abimaran refered


when you
come to the keyword "new," the JVM is obliged to create a new String object at run-time, rather than using the
one from the constant table.


the String object
referenced from the String Literal Pool is created when the class is loaded while the other String object is created
at runtime, when the "new String..." line is executed




so s3 would be assigned the value at runtime rather than at compile time
am i right ?

but ,s3 is not created using the new keyword,so it would have reference in string literal pool

as the link says:
the JVM goes through the code for
the class and looks for String literals. When it finds one, it checks to see if an equivalent String is already
referenced from the heap. If not, it creates a String instance on the heap and stores a reference to that object in
the constant table. Once a reference is made to that String object, any references to that String literal throughout
your program are simply replaced with the reference to the object referenced from the String Literal Pool


so,after line-7 there would be only one entry in the String Literal Pool, which would refer to a
String object that contained the word "abcxyz". Both of the local variables, s5 and s4, would be
assigned a reference to that single String object.
 
Abimaran Kugathasan
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2066
Clojure IntelliJ IDE Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

mohitkumar gupta wrote:

so s3 would be assigned the value at runtime rather than at compile time
am i right ?


Correct, I think!
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 276
Chrome Java Netbeans IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

would store a newly created string(result of s1 + s2) in the Object heap and return the reference to s3. Though values of s1 & s2 are known at compile time, s3 would be constructed at run-time!

mohitkumar gupta wrote:so s3 would be assigned the value at runtime rather than at compile time
am i right ?


Mohit, you are absolutely correct - this happens at run-time. Other than String literals, every other thing is supposed to be considered as run-time created Strings.

Abimaran Kugathasan wrote:Since, the s1 and s2 are in the heap, the object s3 is also in the heap.


Not exactly. Run time Strings will never refer to the String pool, unless otherwise you use .intern() on them. So, s3 wont be == s4 or s5.
 
Abimaran Kugathasan
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2066
Clojure IntelliJ IDE Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Vinoth Kumar Kannan for correcting it!
 
Gari Jain
Ranch Hand
Posts: 100
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The link helped:

Abimaran Kugathasan wrote:

mohitkumar gupta wrote:

why s3 is not part of the pool ?
once

is executed,i think s3 will refer to a object "abcxyz"



Since, the s1 and s2 are in the heap, the object s3 is also in the heap. Read more about String Literal pool in this link.






ThankYou ALL for replying
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!