I found a small mistake in one of the use case specification (out of 5 use cases). In the 'Basic flow’ section actor specified is wrong (it is wrongly specified is all flow steps) and does’ match with destruction just above.
From the description section correct actor can be easily assumed. I thought of going forward with assumption and just specifying in the assumption list. Will it be problem as far as grading is concerned?
I have got assignment pack couple months back, but only now I started working on it. Should I contact Oracle and get it corrected? If yes, whom should I contact?
Most importantly, list this as an assumption in your solution to call attention to it. If you can find a contact on the Oracle site, you could report it that way. I think reporting in your solution is sufficient though. Whomever is grading it can submit the bug report on your behalf.