SCJP 1.6 ,SCWCD 5
Rohan kanade wrote:
Since Erlang was intended for telecom operations software , why is there a push currently to use as a web backend development tool?
How does Erlang's performance compares to Current tools/languages used for web backend development ?
How can Erlang be source interpreted and also compile to bytecode for a VM and also compile to native assembly? Which one is better for what purpose?
Please briefly talk about hotswapping of code in the above context. how is done for say a natively compiled binary of Erlang code?
SCJP 1.6 ,SCWCD 5
Since Erlang was intended for telecom operations software , why is there a push currently to use as a web backend development tool?
How does Erlang's performance compares to Current tools/languages used for web backend development ?
How can Erlang be source interpreted and also compile to bytecode for a VM and also compile to native assembly? Which one is better for what purpose?
Please briefly talk about hotswapping of code in the above context. how is done for say a natively compiled binary of Erlang code?
Rohan kanade wrote:Since Erlang was intended for telecom operations software , why is there a push currently to use as a web backend development tool?
How does Erlang's performance compares to Current tools/languages used for web backend development ?
How can Erlang be source interpreted and also compile to bytecode for a VM and also compile to native assembly? Which one is better for what purpose?
Please briefly talk about hotswapping of code in the above context. how is done for say a natively compiled binary of Erlang code?
Lastly , any examples of open source production usage for Erlang other than the telecom domain?
SCJP 1.6 ,SCWCD 5
If you settle for what they are giving you, you deserve what you get. Fight for this tiny ad!
Smokeless wood heat with a rocket mass heater
https://woodheat.net
|