Win a copy of GANs in ActionE this week in the AI forum
or WebAssembly in Action in the JavaScript forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Paul Clapham
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Knute Snortum
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Joe Ess
  • salvin francis
  • fred rosenberger

Bing copying Google's results

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello Ranchers,

Recently I came across an email with the information saying that Microsoft's Bing is copying the Google's search results.

The official information on the same from Google is here -> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/microsofts-bing-uses-google-search.html.

Can't really digest this! What do you feel?
 
author & internet detective
Posts: 39789
797
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I liked the Colbert Report segment on it.

I think Google did a nice experiment. It is incredibly unlikely real users with the bing toolbar were searching for "hiybbprqag" and then click on the artificially inserted "result."

Google's results could use some more massaging as well for that matter.
 
Raghavan Muthu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3389
Mac MySQL Database Tomcat Server
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:

I think Google did a nice experiment. It is incredibly unlikely real users with the bing toolbar were searching for "hiybbprqag" and then click on the artificially inserted "result."

Google's results could use some more massaging as well for that matter.



Exactly. I was very amazed with this fact and the diligent efforts Google had put in before they can allegate!
 
Rancher
Posts: 4686
7
Mac OS X VI Editor Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
While I agree that its an interesting result, and showed impressive skills on the Googlers part. I'm also convinced that its not important. Moreso, I think it was stupid on Google's part. What they did was say to the world "we are so paranoid that we think Microsoft is stealing from us" when the proper attitude should be more like:

Microsoft? who are they? do they have a search engine, wow, didn't know that.
 
author
Posts: 23853
141
jQuery Eclipse IDE Firefox Browser VI Editor C++ Chrome Java Linux Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

I am surprised that Microsoft is so nonchalant about this. After all, Bing is the supposed "decision engine" right? A huge improvement over a regular search engine right? Where is the value add if they just regurgitate Google results?

Henry
 
Marshal
Posts: 67340
173
Mac Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE jQuery Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The Emperor hasn't had any clothes for some time now.
 
Bartender
Posts: 10336
Hibernate Eclipse IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Not that I'm a Microsoft apologist, and it was an unfeasibly dumb thing for MS to do, but does no else feel it a little ironic of Google accusing others of copying "their" copy? Isn't this an accusation all sorts of organizations have been leveling at Google for a while now? (Google Books, YouTube, Google news etc.)
 
What's wrong? Where are you going? Stop! Read this tiny ad:
Java file APIs (DOC, XLS, PDF, and many more)
https://products.aspose.com/total/java
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!