I have named some of my classes in a verb format, because it make things much clearer. For example, my UpdateRecord class holds the update() that my Data class forwards to. I know typically we are supposed to name classes with nouns, but in some cases I don't see the point in doing so. Any opinions on this? Do you think Oracle will knock me for this?
You can narrow the scope of your noun-hunt further by considering what kind of thing is doing your verb. It's not merely a matter of rifling through the thesaurus (as you joke) in search of an apt phrase. It's also a matter of stepping back and asking: How are you thinking about responsibility?
You write: "my UpdateRecord class holds the update() that my Data class forwards to." Ok, but since a record is what you retrieve by way of the Data class, maybe a Record class should represent a record. And since updating is something done to a record (perhaps by the record itself), wouldn't it make sense to have update be a method either in the Record or in whatever manipulates the Record? (say, a RecordController or a RecordService or a RecordManager....)
Gesture --> Action (a listener) --> [invocation of intermediate controller] --> business service/method --> domain object --> persistence mechanism --> [invocation of integration adapter] --> db.
If you ponder the functional layers of a typical app and ask who should be doing what, the noun/verb thing will sort itself out.