• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Rob Spoor
  • Junilu Lacar
  • paul wheaton
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Scott Selikoff
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Jj Roberts
  • fred rosenberger

arguments for Java FX

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 5
Python Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

I plan to use javafx for some online tools, where I need a sophisticated gui.
I had several silverlight vs. javafx discussions with my coworkers who are more ms affine.
My javafx pro arguments are
-platform independece
-more or less not proprietary
-access to the java ecosystem
-interesting gui concept
It would be great if someone could give me some more ammunition for the next round.


Thanks,
Marco
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2108
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Flex is not an option?
 
Bartender
Posts: 3225
34
IntelliJ IDE Oracle Spring Chrome Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
- Supports Mobile platform.
- Can be used easily in place of the applets.
 
Jesus Angeles
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2108
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
One fact is that you are comparing a microsoft product versus one that is not.

With javafx:

advantage: support of the community, and vendors, who all participate in its growth as a technology
disadvantage: a relatively new technology (just like java 1.2 in its days)
disadvantage: if you have existing java (non-javafx) libraries, you will either use it 'natively' removing platform-independence, or rewrite the whole library in javafx codes

with silverlight:

I honestly dont know anything about it. But for developer support, and vendor support, and non-lock-and-stiff-and-pay-with-microsoft thing, I would consider javafx instead. If pretty gui (flash) is important, and you have a java server, you can look at flex.
 
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic