Anoop Nair wrote:
I tried that and it worked. However, when I try the same thing on another JBoss instance it doesnt work.
Exception in thread "main" javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: jmx not bound
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:581)
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:589)
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getObject(NamingServer.java:595)
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.lookup(NamingServer.java:313)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:305)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:159)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:155)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:535)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:790)
at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:649)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:255)
at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:233)
at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:142)
at org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub.lookup(Unknown Source)
at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:667)
at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:627)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:392)
at org.jboss.Shutdown.main(Shutdown.java:214)
Personally, I would not mix the two methods, nor would I bind any server to 0.0.0.0 when using multiple IP address. In other words, I would either:
a) bind every server to 0.0.0.0 and use different ports
b) bind each server to its own distinct IP address (each using the same ports) - this option requires a separate physical IP address for each server
My requirement is that only one of the servers should be listening on both the IPs, the others shouldnt be.
Could you please point me to some article so that I can understand this ?
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more, it's a tiny ad:
SKIP - a book about connecting industrious people with elderly land owners
https://coderanch.com/t/skip-book
|